UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 131/2024

Mar 20, 2024·EP3831283 · ANALYTE SENSOR DEVICES, CONNECTIONS, AND METHODS

Action number: ACT 14945/2024

Case details
Status
Case ClosedSet aside on appeal, Feb 14, 2025
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional measures
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Jun 19, 2024
Appealed
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Preliminary injunction grantedMedian days to first decision
All UPC54% (38/70)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Petri RinkinenLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Renaud FulconisLockedLocked

At the UPC: Abbott Group (67 cases)·Sibio Technology Limited (15 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-06-19
    Application for provisional measures

    Summary: Application for a preliminary injunction by Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. against Sibio Technology Limited and Umedwings Netherlands B.V. concerning EP 3 831 283 (wearable glucose monitoring device) was denied by The Hague Local Division. The court found it more likely than not that claim 1 of the patent would be held invalid for added matter (the claimed feature of a connector support being received through a distal-facing opening into a recess was not directly and unambiguously derivable from the application as filed). As a result, Abbott must bear defendants' costs. Value of the action set at EUR 4,000,000.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Preliminary injunction denied for likely invalidity on added matter (Art. 123(2) EPC)
    • Balance of probabilities standard for patent validity in PI proceedings
    • Added matter: connector support insertion direction
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Outcome of the Order2025-07-18Not public
sibio order2025-07-18Public
Outcome of the Order2025-07-18Not public
R. 262A Order2025-07-18Public
R. 262A Order2025-07-18Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-06-27Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-06-27Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-06-27Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-06-27Not public
update on state of affairs2025-06-13Not public
update on state of affairs2025-06-13Not public
Receipt2025-03-19Not public
Application2025-03-19Not public
Application2025-03-19Not public
Exhibit S A 12025-03-19Not public
Exhibit S A 12025-03-19Not public
Application2025-03-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-change-of-a-representative2025-02-20Not public
Application-RoP293-Receipt2025-02-20Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-02-20Not public
Application-RoP2932025-02-18Not public
Application to Change a Representative2025-02-18Not public
Abbott's Rejoinder to Application for Costs Decision2024-12-24Not public
Exhibit 22024-12-02Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642024-12-02Not public
Exhibit 12024-12-02Not public
Exhibit 12024-12-02Not public
Exhibit 22024-12-02Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642024-12-02Not public
Sibio cost decision further submission dates2024-11-05Not public
Abbott comment on cost application2024-08-08Not public
Abbott can respond2024-07-30Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-07-25Not public
order R. 115 access to audio recording2024-07-25Public
Receipt2024-07-23Not public
Application2024-07-22Not public
Receipt2024-07-22Not public
Exhibit S CD 12024-07-19Not public
Application2024-07-19Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-06-19Not public
Measures_DecisionOutcome_Notification.pdf2024-06-19Not public
order on preliminary measures2024-06-19Public
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_ 14945-2024-OH_HAG-LOC_UPC202405229am2024-05-24Not public
ORAL_HEARING_REFERENCING_ 14945-2024-OH_HAG-LOC_UPC202405229am2024-05-24Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-15Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 92024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 102024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 122024-05-15Not public
Rejoinder Objection to the Application for provisional measures2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 112024-05-15Not public
Rejoinder Objection to the Application for provisional measures2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 122024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 112024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 102024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 92024-05-15Not public
Rejoinder Objection to the Application for provisional measures2024-05-15Not public
Rejoinder Objection to the Application for provisional measures2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 102024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 92024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 122024-05-15Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 112024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 112024-05-15Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court2024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 102024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 92024-05-15Not public
Exhibit S 122024-05-15Not public
summons2024-05-15Not public
Summons oral hearing 22 May 20242024-05-15Public
Summons oral hearing 22 May 20242024-05-15Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-05-14Not public
R.9 to open workflow for rejoinder2024-05-14Public
Annex F52024-05-08Not public
Annex F42024-05-08Not public
Annex F12024-05-08Not public
Annex F112024-05-08Not public
Reply Abbott - EP 283 proceedings2024-05-08Not public
Annex F32024-05-08Not public
Annex F62024-05-08Not public
Reply Abbott - EP 283 proceedings2024-05-08Not public
Annex F92024-05-08Not public
Annex F82024-05-08Not public
Annex F102024-05-08Not public
Annex F22024-05-08Not public
Annex F72024-05-08Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-05-02Not public
Allocation of TQJ2024-05-02Public
Outcome of the Order2024-04-25Not public
Order Requesting a TQJ2024-04-25Public
Exhibit S 32024-04-23Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court2024-04-23Not public
Bundle of Exhibits S 4.22024-04-23Not public
Bundle of Exhibits S 4.12024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 72024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 22024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 52024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 82024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 12024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 62024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 12024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 82024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 62024-04-23Not public
Formal response to the Order of the Court2024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 52024-04-23Not public
Bundle of Exhibits S 4.12024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 72024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 32024-04-23Not public
Bundle of Exhibits S 4.22024-04-23Not public
Exhibit S 22024-04-23Not public
Order R. 209.1 time lodging objection2024-04-22Public
Notification Of Service2024-04-03Not public
Email to representative Umedwings Netherlands B.V.2024-04-03Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-04-02Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-04-02Not public
Notification Of Service2024-03-29Not public
Email to representative Sibio Technology Limited2024-03-29Not public
Letter for Service2024-03-27Not public
Letter for Service2024-03-27Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-03-26Not public
Application-For-Measures-Receipt2024-03-21Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-03-21Not public
Application-For-Measures-Acknowledgement2024-03-20Not public
Annex C3 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex A1 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex E1 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex D2 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex C1 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex C4 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex D1 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex C5 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex C2 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex D3 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex C6 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex E2 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex B2 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Annex B1 to PI Application2024-03-20Not public
PI Application2024-03-20Not public
Plain-English summary

Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. applied for provisional measures before The Hague Local Division against Sibio Technology Limited and Umedwings Netherlands B.V. concerning EP 3 831 283, a wearable glucose monitoring device patent. The court denied the preliminary injunction, finding on the balance of probabilities that claim 1 would more likely than not be held invalid for added matter, as the feature specifying the direction of coupling of the connector support through the distal-facing opening into the recess was not directly and unambiguously derivable from the application as filed.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Claim 1 more likely than not invalid for added matter: feature of connector support received through distal-facing opening into recess not directly and unambiguously derivable from application as filed

    RespondentLegal basis: Art. 123(2) EPC

    Note: The Hague Local Division found on balance of probabilities that the claimed feature specifying the direction of coupling (from below/distal side) of the connector support through the opening into the recess was not directly and unambiguously disclosed in the application as filed, as the cited embodiments worked in the reverse direction or required combination of separate passages without a pointer.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Feature of connector support received through distal-facing opening into recess is supported by multiple passages and figures in the application as filed

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 123(2) EPC

    Reason: The court found that the cited passages and figures either showed a different embodiment requiring combination without a pointer, or showed the coupling direction working in the reverse manner to what claim 1 recites; no single passage/figure directly and unambiguously disclosed all features together in the claimed configuration.

  • Provisional reimbursement of costs ordered in favour of applicant

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 69 UPCA; R. 118.5 RoP

    Reason: Rejected: as applicant did not prevail, there was no basis for provisional cost reimbursement in its favour.

Prior art relied on
References cited and the role they played.
  • WO 2011/119896Distinguished
Claim construction notes

The critical feature under construction was 'a connector support received through a distal-facing opening into a recess' in the enclosure's bottom portion. The court found this feature characterises a specific coupling direction (from below/distal side), which Abbott itself relied upon to distinguish prior art WO 2011/119896, but which was not directly and unambiguously derivable from the application as filed. The embodiments cited by Abbott either showed reverse coupling or required impermissible combination of separate passages.