UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1536/2025

Nov 18, 2025·EP3079153 SEP · AUDIO DECODING WITH SELECTIVE POST FILTERING

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology
Language
English
First decided
Aug 18, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Anna-Lena KleinLockedLocked
Judge Udo MatterLockedLocked

At the UPC: Dolby Group (38 cases)·Acer Group (11 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-08-18
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: Panel review under R. 333 RoP of the order of 1 May 2026 denied. The Court confirmed that a counterclaim for rate-setting may be directed at an intervener (Vectis, which intervened on Dolby's side) and, in so far as necessary, added Vectis as a party. Leave to appeal granted.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • panel review (R. 333 RoP)
    • intervention (R. 315 RoP)
    • counterclaim against an intervener
    • addition of a party (R. 305 RoP)
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-09-25Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-25Not public
Document2026-09-25Not public
Receipt2026-09-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-24Not public
Document2026-09-24Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-09-23Not public
Order2026-09-23Not public
Order2026-09-23Not public
Communication2026-09-15Not public