UPC CFI 168/2024
Jan 18, 2024·EP3678321 SEP · RESOURCE SCHEDULING METHOD, APPARATUS, AND DEVICE
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionInfringementCategoryMain infringement action
- Parties
- Claimants
- Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Tobias J. Hessel-Clifford Chance Partnerschaft mbB
Respondents- Netgear Inc.Operating co.
- NETGEAR Deutschland GmbHOperating co.
- Netgear International LimitedOperating co.
Representatives- Henning Gutheil-Freshfields
- Stephan Dorn-Freshfields
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Language
- German
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Klaus Loibner | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Huawei Group (62 cases)·Netgear Group (20 cases)
This dispute contains 10 other proceedings
UPC CFI 791/2024·CC 20512/2024·UPC CFI 152/2024·UPC CoA 36/2024·UPC CoA 44/2024 and 5 more
3 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
- 2025-01-10Application RoP 265Public
Summary: Infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (including patent amendment applications) were both withdrawn by mutual agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 265 RoP. Both parties bear their own costs. 40% of court fees refunded to each party. Oral hearing dates cancelled.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Withdrawal of infringement action (Rule 265 RoP)
- Withdrawal of counterclaim for revocation
- Court fee refund
- 2025-01-02
Summary: The Munich Local Division ordered that the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (CC_20512/2024) be heard together before the Munich Local Division, and set dates for an interim conference and oral hearing.
Show the legal issues (1)
- Joinder of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation (R. 37.1 RoP)
- 2024-12-30
Summary: Munich Local Division issued a procedural order requesting the President of the Court of First Instance to reassign a new technically qualified judge to the panel, following the resignation of the previously assigned technically qualified judge Patrice Vidon.
Show the legal issues (1)
- Reassignment of technically qualified judge following resignation
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement-of-change-of-a-representative | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Application-RoP293-Receipt | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-change-of-a-representative | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Application-RoP293-Receipt | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-change-of-a-representative | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Application-RoP293-Receipt | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome | 2025-08-07 | Not public |
| Application-RoP293 | 2025-07-23 | Not public |