View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionRevocationCategoryMain revocation action
- Parties
- Claimants
- BITZER Electronics A/SOperating co.
Respondents- Carrier CorporationOperating co.
- Division
- Paris CD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology · IT methods for management
- InstrumentsMeasurement
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 5, 2023
- EPO Opposition
- Bitzer Electronics A/SAdmissible2023-06-28
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
| Patent revoked | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 37% (34/91) | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Camille Lignières | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: BITZER Electronics A/S (5 cases)·Carrier Corporation (5 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 2 other proceedings
Decisions
- 2023-07-05Revocation ActionPublic
Summary: The Paris Central Division standing judge ruled that a case forwarded under Rule 16.5 RoP had been incorrectly referred as an urgent action, and redirected it to the Registry for normal processing under Rule 16.3 RoP.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Deficiency correction Rule 16 RoP
- Standing judge competence Rule 345.5 RoP
Documents
- 23-07-05-cd-paris-standing-judge-procedural-order-order-regarding-r.-16.5-rop-anonymized.pdf2023-07-05EN