View all cases
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Division
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology · IT methods for management
- InstrumentsMeasurement
- Language
- —
- EPO Opposition
- Bitzer Electronics A/SAdmissible2023-06-28
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge François Thomas | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Catallozzi | Locked |
| Judge Ulrike Keltsch | Locked |
At the UPC: Carrier Corporation (5 cases)·BITZER Electronics A/S (5 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 2 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: 2024
Decisions
- 2024-04-30Application RoP 333Public
Summary: The Paris Central Division ruled that a patent amendment request (EP 3 414 708) is inadmissible to the extent it concerns claims not challenged in the revocation action, establishing that the right to amend is a defensive tool limited to challenged claims.
Show the legal issues (2)
- admissibility of patent amendment as to unchallenged claims
- right to amend as defensive tool R.333 RoP
Documents
- 2024-04-30%20CD%20Paris%20UPC_CFI_263-2023%20ORD_24607-2024%20App_20743-2024%20anonymized.pdf2024-04-30EN