UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1901/2026

May 28, 2026·EP2377536 · Methods of Using Sustained Release Aminopyridine Compositions

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Paris LD
Technology
  • Chemistry
    Pharmaceuticals
Language
English
First decided
Jul 30, 2026
Last decision
Oct 15, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • Actavis Group PTC ehfAdmissible2013-12-05
  • Synthon B.V.Admissible2013-12-06
  • neuraxpharm Arzneimittel GmbHAdmissible2013-12-06
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Paris LDLockedLocked
Judge Camille LignièresLockedLocked
Judge Carine GilletLockedLocked
Judge Samuel GranataLockedLocked
Judge Rainer Friedrich—Locked

At the UPC: Merz Pharma France (6 cases)·Viatris Santé (6 cases)

This dispute contains 5 other proceedings

UPC CFI 3259/2026·UPC CoA 917/2025·UPC CoA 906/2025·UPC CFI 697/2025·UPC APP 36985/2025

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 3290/2026

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Paris LD·2026

Decisions
  • 2026-10-15
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: Paris Local Division full panel, on Viatris' request, refers the counterclaim for revocation of the SPC/EP2377536 (UPC_CFI_3259/2026) to the Paris Central Division, which is to deal with the stay question, and lets the infringement action continue before the Local Division. No ruling on infringement or validity.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Bifurcation of counterclaim for revocation, Art. 33(3)(b) UPCA and R. 37.2 RoP
    • Referral of SPC validity counterclaim to Paris Central Division
    • Stay pending French court proceedings (Brussels I recast Art. 29-30)
    • Referral to the panel, R. 102 RoP
  • 2026-07-30
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Paris Local Division rejected in its entirety the preliminary objection raised by Viatris Santé under R. 19.1(a) RoP, which sought a declination of jurisdiction in favour of the Tribunal Judiciaire de Paris on lis pendens grounds and, in the alternative, a stay. The request for a stay under R. 295 RoP was also rejected and costs were reserved to the main proceedings. The Court reasoned that the UPC decision is likely to be handed down before that of the national court and that a stay would unduly delay proceedings.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • preliminary objection on jurisdiction (R. 19.1(a) RoP)
    • lis pendens under Art. 29 Brussels I recast
    • related actions under Art. 30 Brussels I recast
    • stay of proceedings (R. 295(b), (l) and (m) RoP)
    • French SPC based on a European patent
Document titleDatePublic
Publication of order2026-10-16Not public
Order2026-10-15Not public
Order2026-10-15Public
Receipt2026-09-28Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-28Not public
Submission Claimant2026-09-28Not public
Communication2026-09-11Not public
Receipt2026-09-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-10Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-09-10Not public