UPC CFI 697/2025
Jul 31, 2025·EP2377536 · Methods of Using Sustained Release Aminopyridine Compositions
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedSet aside on appeal, Apr 27, 2026ActionProvisional measuresCategoryProvisional measures
- Parties
- Claimants
- Merz Pharmaceuticals LLCOperating co.
- Merz Therapeutics GmbHOperating co.
- Merz Pharma FranceOperating co.
Representatives- Laëtitia Bénard-A&O Shearman
- Charles Tuffreau-A&O Shearman
- Edward Oates
- Agathe Michel-De Cazotte-Carpmaels & Ransford
Respondents- Viatris SantéOperating co.
Representatives- Marc Lauzeral-Schertenleib
- Denis Schertenleib-Schertenleib
- Division
- Paris LD
- Technology
- ChemistryPharmaceuticals
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Nov 21, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Actavis Group PTC ehfAdmissible2013-12-05
- Synthon B.V.Admissible2013-12-06
- neuraxpharm Arzneimittel GmbHAdmissible2013-12-06
- Appealed
- Set aside by UPC CoA 917/2025 · Apr 27, 2026
| Preliminary injunction granted | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 54% (38/70) | 124 |
| Paris LD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Camille Lignières | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Carine Gillet | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Samuel Granata | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Rainer Friedrich | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Merz Pharmaceuticals LLC (7 cases)·Viatris Santé (6 cases)
This dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CFI 3259/2026·UPC CFI 1901/2026·UPC CoA 917/2025·UPC CoA 906/2025·UPC APP 36985/2025
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
- 2025-11-21Application for provisional measuresPublic
Summary: The Paris Local Division (full panel) rejected Merz's application for provisional measures against Viatris concerning French SPC 033 (based on EP 2 377 536) and the generic product 'FAMPRIDINE VIATRIS LP 10 mg', holding that Merz failed to seek provisional measures within the reasonable time required by R.211.4 RoP: Merz was, or should have been, aware of the imminent infringement well before it filed on 31 July 2025 (at the latest from 2 January 2025, when it recovered direct exploitation rights to FAMPYRA, itself five months before it sent a warning letter, and six months before it applied to the Court after Viatris confirmed the French launch). The Court did not reach the merits of infringement or SPC validity, and ordered Merz to pay Viatris EUR 56,000 in interim costs.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Unreasonable delay in seeking provisional measures (R.211.4 RoP)
- Starting point for calculating diligence when the alleged infringer is a generic manufacturer (imminent infringement under Art. 62.1 UPCA / R.211.2 RoP vs. actual market launch)
- Whether a Court of Appeal decision interpreting R.211.4 RoP (Boehringer v Zentiva, 13 Aug 2025) creates a new legal situation that cannot be invoked against a party for legal-certainty reasons
- Interim award of costs on rejection of a provisional-measures application (R.211.1(d) RoP)
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-06-08 | Not public |
| Communication | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Communication | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-11-21 | Public |
| Decision | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Final Order | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Oral procedure closed | 2025-11-21 | Not public |