UPC CFI 1902/2025

Vor dem UPC: Cardo Systems, Ltd. (6 Verfahren)·Shenzhen Ziwu Chuangxin Technology Co., Ltd. (4 Verfahren)

• 2026-07-29
  InfringementÖffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Milan Local Division panel dismissed Cardo's application under R. 9, 333 and 334(a) RoP for review and shortening of deadlines, upholding the judge-rapporteur's order that set a notional common start date of 10 June 2026 for all defendants' statements of defence. The Panel held the order was a balanced compromise that extended time for Ziwu while shortening it by an equivalent period for Resosport, and noted the Court cannot compel a representative to accept service under R. 271.1(c) RoP.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • review of a judge-rapporteur order under R. 333 RoP
  • alignment of service dates and the R. 23 RoP period for the statement of defence
  • shortening of time limits under R. 9.3 and R. 334(a) RoP
  • no power to compel a representative to accept service under R. 271.1(c) RoP
• 2026-07-10
  InfringementÖffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Milan Local Division issued a procedural order under R. 9 RoP aligning the deadlines for all defendants to file their statements of defence and counterclaims for revocation. The judge rapporteur set 10 June 2026 as a notional common starting date for all defendants (subject to Resosport's immediate acceptance of service), resulting in a common deadline of 10 September 2026 for filing defences.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Alignment of deadlines under R. 9.3 and R. 334(a) RoP
  • Service of statement of claim on a foreign defendant (Resosport in Hong Kong) under R. 271.1(c) RoP
  • Extension and alignment of R. 23 RoP deadline for filing statement of defence
  • Principles of efficiency, equity, fairness and proportionality in case management