UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 202/2025

Mar 6, 2025·EP3646825 · A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PROSTHETIC VALVE AND A DELIVERY CATHETER

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Settled)
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional measures
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Milan LD
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Preliminary injunction grantedMedian days to first decision
All UPC54% (38/70)124
Milan LDLockedLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Alima ZanaLockedLocked

At the UPC: Edwards Lifesciences Group (57 cases)·Sintec S.r.l. (1 case)

Decisions
  • 2025-09-05
    Application RoP 365Public

    Summary: Milan Local Division confirmed the settlement agreement between Edwards Lifesciences and the respondents (Sintec and Value Med) in provisional measures proceedings concerning EP 3 646 825. The Court confirmed the settlement under Art. 79 UPCA and R.365 RoP, making it enforceable as a final decision. The request for reimbursement of 60% of court fees was dismissed.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Confirmation of settlement under Art. 79 UPCA and R.365 RoP
    • Enforceability of confirmed settlement
    • Court fee reimbursement
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-11-25Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-09-05Not public
decision 365 rop2025-09-05Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-30Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-30Not public
preliminary order2025-07-23Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-17Not public
Exhibit HL 2-App2025-07-17Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-17Not public
Exhibit HL 2-App2025-07-17Not public
Coverage: Partial.Reasoning extracted with partial coverage — some sections may be incomplete.
Plain-English summary

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's application for provisional measures against Sintec s.r.l. and Value Med s.r.l. concerning EP 3 646 825 (prosthetic valve delivery system) settled following judge-rapporteur-facilitated negotiations at the Milan Local Division. The Court confirmed the settlement as an enforceable final decision under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365 RoP, but dismissed Edwards' request for 60% reimbursement of court fees.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Settlement agreement between Edwards Lifesciences and Sintec/Value Med to be confirmed as enforceable decision under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365.1 RoP

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 79 UPCA; R. 365.1 RoP

    Note: Court confirmed the settlement signed 23 June 2025 and made it enforceable as a final court decision.

  • Redacted version of settlement to be published, with full text confidential

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 365 RoP

    Note: Court ordered publication of redacted version only.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • 60% reimbursement of court fees (EUR 6,600) requested by Edwards under R. 370.9(c) and 370.11 RoP

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 370.9(c) RoP; R. 370.11 RoP

    Reason: Request for court fee reimbursement was dismissed; specific grounds not reproduced in the available excerpt.