View all cases
UPC CoA 166/2025
Feb 24, 2025·EP3646825: A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PROSTHETIC VALVE AND A DELIVERY CATHETER
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionGenericCategoryMain Appeal
- Parties
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Pharmaceutical & Medical
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Apr 18, 2025
Decisions
- 2025-04-18Application Rop 223
The Court of Appeal refused Meril's application for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Munich Local Division's infringement decision in favour of Edwards Lifesciences, meaning the first-instance judgment remained enforceable pending appeal.
Legal issues:Suspensive effect of appealRule 223 RoP applicationEnforcement pending appeal
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| action.phaseChange.caseClose | 2025-11-28 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-04-18 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-04-18 | Not public |
| Order suspensive effect | 2025-04-18 | Public |
| Edwards response to Meril application for suspensive effect | 2025-03-20 | Not public |
| Preliminary order suspensive effect | 2025-02-27 | Not public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2025-02-25 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-02-25 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 3 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 5 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 4 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 3 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 7 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 4 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 6 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 1 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 5 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 8 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Application for suspensive effect | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit HL-Appeal 6 | 2025-02-24 | Not public |