UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 166/2025

Feb 24, 2025·EP3646825 · A SYSTEM COMPRISING A PROSTHETIC VALVE AND A DELIVERY CATHETER

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Apr 18, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked
Judge Emmanuel GougéLocked
Judge Elisabetta PapaLocked
Judge Max TilmannLocked

At the UPC: Meril Group (60 cases)·Edwards Lifesciences Group (57 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-04-18
    Application RoP 223Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal refused Meril's application for suspensive effect of their appeal against the Munich Local Division's infringement decision in favour of Edwards Lifesciences, meaning the first-instance judgment remained enforceable pending appeal.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Suspensive effect of appeal
    • Rule 223 RoP application
    • Enforcement pending appeal
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-11-28Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-04-18Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-04-18Not public
Order suspensive effect2025-04-18Public
Edwards response to Meril application for suspensive effect2025-03-20Not public
Preliminary order suspensive effect2025-02-27Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-02-25Not public
Receipt2025-02-25Not public
Exhibit HL-Appeal 32025-02-24Not public
Exhibit HL-Appeal 52025-02-24Not public