View all cases
UPC CFI 2280/2025
—·EP3878161: INTELLIGENT, DECENTRALIZED AND AUTONOMOUS MARKETPLACE FOR DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND STORAGE
- Case details
- Status—ActionInfringementCategoryMain Infringement Action
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- Jan Phillip Rektorschek-PENTRAC Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB
- Tobias Baus-PENTRAC Rechtsanwälte PartG mbB
RespondentsRepresentatives- Sebastian Ochs-Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartGmbH
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Daniel Severinsson · rapporteur
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 2, 2026
Decisions
- 2026-09-02InfringementPublic
Summary: Munich Local Division procedural order of the judge-rapporteur (2 Sep 2026) in IAGON LTD v Influx Technologies USA LLC, Influx Technologies Limited and two natural persons (EP 3 878 161 B1): the defendants' request that the UAE-seated claimant provide security for costs of EUR 112,000 (R. 158 RoP) is rejected, because the MiCA white paper shows funding for 36 months and no liabilities, the affiliate's 2022 distress is outdated, and no concrete enforcement difficulty in the UAE was shown. Counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_3018/2026 noted.
Show the legal issues (3)
- R. 158 RoP / Art. 69(4) UPCA security for costs: burden on the applicant, financial position and enforceability (Syntorr v Arthrex, Amycel, Chint v Jingao)
- registered office outside the EU/EEA not sufficient in itself
- MiCA white paper as evidence of financial standing
Documents
- 78f1d3b3-0dd0-4f62-a626-747ce75cee44.pdf2026-09-02EN