Overview · Filed: Jan 26, 2024
UPC_CFI_26/2024
DEVICE- ASSISTED SERVICES FOR PROTECTING NETWORK CAPACITY
InfringementMain Infringement ActionDusseldorf LDInfringementCase ClosedSettled at: Post-merits
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 265 | withdrawal of infringement action | Binding | SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS: R. 265 RoP |
| 158 | security for costs procedure | Binding | According to R. 158.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the UPC (RoP), at any time during proceedings, following a reasoned request by one party, the Court may order the other party to provide, within a specified time period, adequate security |
UPC Court of Appeal · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_569/2024 | admissibility of withdrawal where no final decision yet | Binding | According to the Court of Appeal, an application to withdraw the infringement action are admissible in case there is no final decision in the action in view of a pending appeal (CoA_569/2014, Order of 24 February 2025, Dexom ./. Abbott). |
| UPC_CoA_548/2024 | standard for security for costs - undue burden of enforcement | Binding | The Court of Appeal of the UPC (CoA) has on its order 29 November 2024 (UPC_CoA_548/2024, APL_52969/2024 – Aarke v SodaStream) ruled that, when deciding on a request for security for costs, it is not required that it is proven that enforcement is impossible. |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | security for costs | Binding | Based on Article 69(4) of the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPCA), at the request of the defendant, the Court may order the applicant to provide adequate security for the legal costs |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
| Cited in | Date | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APL_38948/2024 Court of Appeal | Sep 18, 2024 | internal working language as relevant circumstance for language change | Persuasive | the internal working language, the possibility of internal coordination and of support on technical issues only accessible in a location within the corporate group where the working language was English, were – rightly - taken into account as relevant circumstances in the Order of 30 May 2024 (App_22729/2024; UPC_CFI_26/2024) |