UPC CFI 26/2024
26. Jan. 2024·EP3110069 · DEVICE- ASSISTED SERVICES FOR PROTECTING NETWORK CAPACITY
Hauptaktenzeichen: ACT 3932/2024
- Verfahrensdetails
- StatusCase Closed (Keine Verletzung)VerfahrensartVerletzungKategorieHauptverletzungsklage
- Parteien
- KlägerVertreter
- Michael Schneider-Eisenführ Speiser
- Jochen Ehlers-Eisenführ Speiser
Beklagte- Samsung Electronics GmbHUnternehmen
- Samsung Electronics France S.A.S.Unternehmen
- Samsung Electronics Benelux B.V.Unternehmen
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Unternehmen
Vertreter- Martin Köhler-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technologie
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Sprache
- English
- Erste Entscheidung
- 15. Juni 2025
- Letzte Entscheidung
- 26. Sept. 2025
| Verletzung festgestellt | Median Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung | |
|---|---|---|
| Gesamt-UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Ronny Thomas | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Berenice Thom | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Peter Agergaard | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
| Richter Eric Augarde | Gesperrt | Gesperrt |
Vor dem UPC: Headwater Research LLC (34 Verfahren)·Samsung Group (57 Verfahren)
Dieser Streit umfasst 4 weitere Verfahren
UPC CFI 833/2025·UPC CFI 820/2025·UPC CFI 320/2024·UPC APP 22744/2024
6 weitere Beklagte zum selben oder einem verwandten Patent
UPC CFI 2814/2026·UPC CFI 432/2025·UPC CFI 28/2025·UPC CFI 494/2024·UPC CFI 149/2024 und 1 weitere
Starten Sie die kostenlose Testphase, um die Ausgänge zu sehen.
Weitere Verfahren: Dusseldorf LD·2024
- 2025-09-26Withdrawal (RoP265)Öffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division recorded the withdrawal by Headwater Research LLC of its infringement action (EP 3 110 069) against Samsung Electronics entities after the court had issued a decision on 30 July 2025 dismissing the infringement action and revoking the patent; both parties to bear own costs.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (2)
- Withdrawal after merits decision (R. 265 RoP)
- Cost allocation after withdrawal
- 2025-07-30Infringement ActionÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Headwater Research LLC's infringement action against Samsung and revoked European patent EP 3 110 069 B1 to the extent of claim 1, on the basis of a successful counterclaim for revocation; all costs were borne by the claimant. The court also rejected a new argument on added matter as inadmissible under R. 9.2 RoP.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
- Patent revocation on counterclaim
- Admissibility of new arguments under R. 9.2 RoP (front-loaded procedure)
- Added matter as ground for revocation
- 2025-06-15Infringement ActionÖffentlich
Zusammenfassung: Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Samsung's application for security for costs against Headwater Research LLC under R. 158 RoP. The Court found that while enforcing a cost order against a US-domiciled entity might be more burdensome, the evidence showed Headwater generates recurring revenues from licensing, making the concern about non-recovery insufficiently justified.
Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)
- Security for costs dismissed (R. 158 RoP, Art. 69(4) UPCA)
- US-domiciled claimant
- Enforcement burden assessment
- NPE / patent licensing entity
| Dokumenttitel | Datum | Öffentlich |
|---|---|---|
| Entscheidung | 2025-09-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Decision | 2025-09-26 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Cover sheet | 2025-09-24 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Application | 2025-09-24 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2025-09-24 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Mitteilung | 2025-09-24 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Mitteilung | 2025-09-23 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Anordnung | 2025-09-23 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Order | 2025-09-23 | Nicht öffentlich |
| Receipt | 2025-09-18 | Nicht öffentlich |
Headwater Research LLC brought an infringement action against Samsung Electronics entities at the Düsseldorf Local Division concerning EP 3 110 069 B1 (device-assisted services for protecting network capacity). The court dismissed the infringement action and revoked claim 1 of the patent by decision of 30 July 2025; before the appeal period expired, Headwater withdrew the action with Samsung's consent, rendering the July 2025 decision ineffective. Each party bears its own costs.
Counterclaim for revocation of EP 3 110 069 B1 claim 1 is well-founded
BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 65 UPCAHinweis: Samsung's counterclaim for revocation succeeded, with the court revoking EP 3 110 069 B1 to the extent of claim 1 and consequently dismissing the infringement action.
Samsung should be ordered to provide security for costs against Headwater
BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: R. 158 RoP; Art. 69(4) UPCABegründung: The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed the security-for-costs application because Samsung failed to provide evidence of applicable foreign law or its application, and Headwater demonstrated recurring licensing revenues making insolvency risk insufficient.
New line of arguments on added matter based on different passages of a lengthy document should be admitted
KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Rule 9.2 RoPBegründung: The court rejected the new added-matter argument under Rule 9.2 RoP because the issue had been raised from the outset but the new argument relied on entirely different passages of a lengthy document, undermining the front-loaded procedure; neither the court nor the other party could be forced to deal with it from scratch.
Weitere Fälle zu diesem Grundsatz ansehen.