UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: Jan 14, 2025

UPC_CFI_26/2025

PACKAGE, IN PARTICULAR FOR FOOD PRODUCTS

InfringementMain Infringement ActionVienna LDInfringementCase Closed
Parties

Claimants

  • Messerle GmbH
Reps: Florian Robl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte); Markus Gangl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte)

Respondents

  • Sabert Corporation Europe S.A.
Reps: Prof. Ddr. Mireille Buydens (Janson); Charles Bernard (Janson); Ludivine Coulon (Janson); Sjors de Koning (Janson)
Judges
  • Walter Schober
  • Anna-Lena Klein
  • Kai Härmand
  • Max Tilmann
Patents
  • EP3705415
  • EP 3 705 415
CPC codes: B65D43/02, B65D2543/00296, B65D2543/00361, B65D5/24, B65D2543/00527, B65D5/2009, B65D2543/00537, B65D15/22, B65D2543/00712, B65D43/0204, B65D2543/00194, B65D85/36

Technology area: Industrial Manufacturing · Packaging Machines

Sector: Packaging & Conveying

Outcome
Not infringedNot infringed
Filed: Jan 14, 2025
First decided: Feb 19, 2026
Language: English

The Vienna Local Division dismissed both Messerle GmbH's infringement action and Sabert Corporation Europe's counterclaim for revocation concerning EP 3 705 415 B1 (a packaging-related patent). The infringement action was dismissed because the accused 'Tray2Go' product did not directly or equivalently infringe the patent claims — the Court found no technical-functional equivalence of the substitute means used in the accused product. The counterclaim for revocation was also dismissed, so the patent was maintained as granted. Each party bears its own costs (maximum EUR 600,000 total, split evenly between action and counterclaim).

Open on UPC Registry
Claims
At issueall
Maintainedall
Not infringedall
Notes: Infringement action dismissed for lack of direct or equivalent infringement of EP 3 705 415 B1; counterclaim for revocation also dismissed, patent maintained as granted.