UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 14. Jan. 2025

UPC_CFI_26/2025

PACKAGE, IN PARTICULAR FOR FOOD PRODUCTS

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageVienna LDInfringementCase Closed
Parteien

Kläger

  • Messerle GmbH
Vertreter: Florian Robl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte); Markus Gangl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte)

Beklagte

  • Sabert Corporation Europe S.A.
Vertreter: Prof. Ddr. Mireille Buydens (Janson); Charles Bernard (Janson); Ludivine Coulon (Janson); Sjors de Koning (Janson)
Richter
  • Walter Schober
  • Anna-Lena Klein
  • Kai Härmand
  • Max Tilmann
Patente
  • EP3705415
  • EP 3 705 415
CPC-Codes: B65D43/02, B65D2543/00296, B65D2543/00361, B65D5/24, B65D2543/00527, B65D5/2009, B65D2543/00537, B65D15/22, B65D2543/00712, B65D43/0204, B65D2543/00194, B65D85/36

Technologiebereich: Industrial Manufacturing · Packaging Machines

Sektor: Packaging & Conveying

Ausgang
Nicht verletztNicht verletzt
Eingereicht: 14. Jan. 2025
Erste Entscheidung: 19. Feb. 2026
Sprache: English

The Vienna Local Division dismissed both Messerle GmbH's infringement action and Sabert Corporation Europe's counterclaim for revocation concerning EP 3 705 415 B1 (a packaging-related patent). The infringement action was dismissed because the accused 'Tray2Go' product did not directly or equivalently infringe the patent claims — the Court found no technical-functional equivalence of the substitute means used in the accused product. The counterclaim for revocation was also dismissed, so the patent was maintained as granted. Each party bears its own costs (maximum EUR 600,000 total, split evenly between action and counterclaim).

Im UPC-Register öffnen
Ansprüche
Streitigall
Aufrechterhaltenall
Nicht verletztall
Hinweise: Infringement action dismissed for lack of direct or equivalent infringement of EP 3 705 415 B1; counterclaim for revocation also dismissed, patent maintained as granted.