UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 323/2025

Apr 7, 2025·EP2364485 · METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTHENTICATING GEOMETRICAL CODES

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Settled)
Action
Revocation
Category
Main revocation action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
  • Jean-Christophe Guerrini
  • Sandrine Bouvier-Ravon
  • Gilles Ringeisen
  • Atsuya Takeshita
Respondents
Representatives
  • Lisa le Stanc
Division
Paris CD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology
Language
French
First decided
Sep 25, 2025
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Paris CDLockedLocked
Judge Mélanie BessaudLockedLocked
Judge Maximilian HaedickeLockedLocked
Judge Wiem SamoudLockedLocked

At the UPC: ScanTrust, SA (1 case)·Advanced Track And Trace (1 case)

Decisions
  • 2025-09-25
    Application RoP 365Public

    Summary: The Central Division Paris (presiding judge Bessaud) homologated the settlement agreement between Scantrust SA and Advanced Track and Trace (ATT) in the revocation action concerning EP 2 364 485 (geometric code authentication method), recording the settlement as an enforceable court decision pursuant to R. 365 RoP.

    Show the legal issues (2)
    • Homologation of settlement (R. 365 RoP)
    • Confidentiality of settlement terms
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-11-24Not public
Other Documents2025-10-01Not public
Decision2025-09-29Not public
Final Order2025-09-29Not public
Cover sheet2025-09-25Not public
Other document2025-09-25Not public
Other document2025-09-25Not public
Receipt2025-09-25Not public
Oral procedure closed2025-09-25Not public
Written procedure closed2025-09-24Not public
Plain-English summary

ScanTrust SA's revocation action against Advanced Track And Trace (ATT) concerning EP 2 364 485 (geometric code authentication method) settled before the oral hearing, and the Paris Central Division homologated the parties' settlement agreement under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365 RoP, making it enforceable as a final court decision with the detailed terms kept confidential.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Settlement agreement between Scantrust and ATT should be homologated by the Court as an enforceable decision

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 79 UPCA; R. 365(1) RoP

    Note: Court homologated the settlement signed 22 September 2025 upon joint request of the parties.

  • Redacted version of settlement agreement to be published, with full text remaining confidential

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 365(2) RoP

    Note: Court ordered publication of redacted version only, with non-redacted version excluded from public access.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

No rejected arguments captured.