UPClytics
EnglishDeutsch
Sign inSign up
View all cases

UPC CFI 323/2025

Apr 7, 2025·EP2364485: METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AUTHENTICATING GEOMETRICAL CODES

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Revocation
Category
Main Revocation Action
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Jean-Christophe Guerrini; Sandrine Bouvier-Ravon
Respondents
Reps: Lisa le Stanc
Division
Paris CD
Judges
Technology
Software & Computing · Authentication & ID · Computing & AI
Language
French
First decided
Sep 25, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-09-25
    SettledApplication Rop 365

    The Central Division Paris (presiding judge Bessaud) homologated the settlement agreement between Scantrust SA and Advanced Track and Trace (ATT) in the revocation action concerning EP 2 364 485 (geometric code authentication method), recording the settlement as an enforceable court decision pursuant to R. 365 RoP.

    Legal issues:Homologation of settlement (R. 365 RoP)Confidentiality of settlement terms
  • 2025-09-25
    SettledSubstantive — otherGeneric Order

    Duplicate of the Central Division Paris decision homologating the settlement between Scantrust and ATT in the EP 2 364 485 revocation proceedings (R. 365 RoP).

    Legal issues:Settlement homologation (R. 365 RoP)
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-11-24Not public
Other Documents2025-10-01Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2025-09-29Not public
Final Order2025-09-29Not public
Cover sheet2025-09-25Not public
Other document2025-09-25Not public
Other document2025-09-25Not public
Receipt2025-09-25Not public
action.phaseChange.oralPhaseClose2025-09-25Not public
action.phaseChange.writtenPhaseClose2025-09-24Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2025-08-06Not public
Hearing-Dates2025-07-30Not public
Convocation à l'audience du 25 septembre 2025 à 9h302025-07-29Public
Template-Order2025-07-29Not public
cloture phase ecrite2025-07-09Public
Panel-Appointment2025-07-03Not public
Observations sur la declaration de derogation et sur l audience de plaidoirie2025-07-02Not public
ordonnance R92025-06-27Public
Notification Of Service2025-04-16Not public
Service by Post - LRAR2025-04-16Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-14Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-14Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-14Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-14Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-11Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-10Not public
Letter-for-Service2025-04-10Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-04-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
communicationCheck2025-04-10Not public
Document from EPO2025-04-10Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-08Not public
Demande de changement du représentant de ScanTrust2025-04-08Not public
Avis Sirene Plasseraud IP Avocats2025-04-08Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2025-04-08Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-08Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-04-08Not public
(D2) - EP 1 239 413 A2 septembre 20022025-04-08Not public
Article Copy Detectable Images From Theory to practice - January 20082025-04-08Not public
Extrait du registre du commerce pour Scantrust2025-04-08Not public
Mise en demeure du 27 fevrier 20252025-04-08Not public
Memoire en nullite2025-04-08Not public
Extrait Kbis d'ATT2025-04-08Not public
(D3) - WO 2007138201 A1 Decembre 20072025-04-08Not public
Statuts de la societe Scantrust2025-04-08Not public
Requête Règle 44-i)2025-04-08Not public
18 Article - On the Security of Copy Detectable Images- September 7-12 20082025-04-08Not public
Opposition d'ATT2025-04-08Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 5214 A12025-04-08Not public
Notification Regle 370-8-a)2025-04-08Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20212025-04-08Not public
Mémoire en nullité complété2025-04-08Not public
(D4) - WO 2008009826 A2 janvier 20082025-04-08Not public
Situation juridique du brevet EP 2 364 4852025-04-08Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 06673 A12025-04-08Not public
D1 - Demande WO 03098540 A1 Novembre 20032025-04-08Not public
Mémoire en nullité modifié2025-04-08Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20232025-04-08Not public
Statuts d'ATT2025-04-08Not public
Brevet EP 2 364 485 B12025-04-08Not public
Brevet EP 3 066 6122025-04-08Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2025-04-08Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-07Not public
Demande de changement représentant2025-04-07Not public
Extrait Kbis d'ATT2025-04-07Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20212025-04-07Not public
Notification Regle 370-8-a)2025-04-07Not public
Article Copy Detectable Images From Theory to practice - January 20082025-04-07Not public
Extrait du registre du commerce pour Scantrust2025-04-07Not public
18 Article - On the Security of Copy Detectable Images- September 7-12 20082025-04-07Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20232025-04-07Not public
Opposition d'ATT2025-04-07Not public
Mise en demeure du 27 fevrier 20252025-04-07Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 5214 A12025-04-07Not public
(D2) - EP 1 239 413 A2 septembre 20022025-04-07Not public
(D3) - WO 2007138201 A1 Decembre 20072025-04-07Not public
Statuts de la societe Scantrust2025-04-07Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 06673 A12025-04-07Not public
D1 - Demande WO 03098540 A1 Novembre 20032025-04-07Not public
Requête Règle 44-i)2025-04-07Not public
Mémoire en nullité modifié2025-04-07Not public
Memoire en nullite2025-04-07Not public
Brevet EP 3 066 6122025-04-07Not public
Brevet EP 2 364 485 B12025-04-07Not public
Statuts d'ATT2025-04-07Not public
(D4) - WO 2008009826 A2 janvier 20082025-04-07Not public
Situation juridique du brevet EP 2 364 4852025-04-07Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2025-04-07Not public
(D2) - EP 1 239 413 A2 septembre 20022025-04-04Not public
Article Copy Detectable Images From Theory to practice - January 20082025-04-04Not public
Extrait du registre du commerce pour Scantrust2025-04-04Not public
Extrait Kbis d'ATT2025-04-04Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 5214 A12025-04-04Not public
Notification Regle 370-8-a)2025-04-04Not public
Demande de brevet FR 08 06673 A12025-04-04Not public
Brevet EP 2 364 485 B12025-04-04Not public
(D3) - WO 2007138201 A1 Decembre 20072025-04-04Not public
Opposition d'ATT2025-04-04Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20212025-04-04Not public
Memoire en nullite2025-04-04Not public
18 Article - On the Security of Copy Detectable Images- September 7-12 20082025-04-04Not public
Situation juridique du brevet EP 2 364 4852025-04-04Not public
Statuts d'ATT2025-04-04Not public
Mise en demeure du 27 fevrier 20252025-04-04Not public
(D4) - WO 2008009826 A2 janvier 20082025-04-04Not public
D1 - Demande WO 03098540 A1 Novembre 20032025-04-04Not public
Brevet EP 3 066 6122025-04-04Not public
Comptes sociaux d'ATT pour 20232025-04-04Not public
Statuts de la societe Scantrust2025-04-04Not public
Plain-English summary

ScanTrust SA's revocation action against Advanced Track And Trace (ATT) concerning EP 2 364 485 (geometric code authentication method) settled before the oral hearing, and the Paris Central Division homologated the parties' settlement agreement under Art. 79 UPCA and R. 365 RoP, making it enforceable as a final court decision with the detailed terms kept confidential.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.

  • Settlement agreement between Scantrust and ATT should be homologated by the Court as an enforceable decision

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 79 UPCA; R. 365(1) RoP

    Note: Court homologated the settlement signed 22 September 2025 upon joint request of the parties.

  • Redacted version of settlement agreement to be published, with full text remaining confidential

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 365(2) RoP

    Note: Court ordered publication of redacted version only, with non-redacted version excluded from public access.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

No rejected arguments captured.

Key legal principles
Doctrines and rules cited in the reasoning.
homologation of settlement as enforceable court decision under Art. 79 UPCAconfidentiality of settlement terms under R. 365(2) RoPeach party bears its own costs where settlement does not address costs allocation to Court

Browse other cases on this principle.