UPC_CFI_368/2024

ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE EQUIPPED WITH A MEANS OF ADJUSTING THE ANGULAR POSITION OF THE SHAFT

Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresDusseldorf LDProvisional measuresCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
8.5	jurisdiction — rebuttable presumption of entitlement from patent register	Binding	if the patent proprietor is registered in the European Patent Register or in the national register(s), it may initially rely on a rebuttable presumption (R. 8.5 (c) RoP).
211.4	urgency — unreasonable delay in applying for provisional measures	Binding	Whether a delay is unreasonable within the meaning of R. 211.4 RoP depends on the circumstances of the individual case.
354.3	jurisdiction — penalty payments procedure	Binding	These penalties will be determined by the Local Division in Düsseldorf upon request by the Applicant (Art. 63(2) UPCA; R. 354.3 RoP).
353	claim construction — rectification of obvious slips in orders	Binding	According to R. 353 RoP, the Court may upon an application by a party made within one month of service of the decision or order, rectify clerical mistakes, errors in calculation and obvious slips in the decision or order.
9.1	jurisdiction — review of allocation of technically qualified judge	Binding	MAGNA entities – referring to R. 9(1) RoP – request for a review of the allocation of a technically qualified judge and to allocate a technically qualified judge with experience in the field of mechanical engineering.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
63(2)	jurisdiction — penalty payments for non-compliance with orders	Binding	These penalties will be determined by the Local Division in Düsseldorf upon request by the Applicant (Art. 63(2) UPCA; R. 354.3 RoP).
73(2)(a)	jurisdiction — 15-day appeal period from PI order	Background	The Applicant and the Defendants may bring an appeal against the present order within 15 days of service of this order (Art. 73(2)(a), 62 UPCA, R. 220.1(c), 224.2(b) RoP).
62	jurisdiction — provisional measures	Background	The Applicant and the Defendants may bring an appeal against the present order within 15 days of service of this order (Art. 73(2)(a), 62 UPCA, R. 220.1(c), 224.2(b) RoP).

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_177/2023	claim construction — definition of obvious slip for rectification purposes	Binding	"Obvious slips" within the meaning of R. 353 RoP are all incorrect or incomplete statements of what the Court actually intended in the order or decision ... (UPC_CFI_177/2023, Order dated 30 June 2023, under II.1. – myStromer/Revolt Zycling).

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Cited in	Date	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_541/2024 Mannheim LD	Dec 20, 2024	security for costs — security as compensation for provisional assessment in PI proceedings	Persuasive	vgl. Lokalkammer Düsseldorf, Order vom 31.10.2024, UPC_CFI_368/2024, V.4 (S. 38)
UPC_CFI_541/2024 Mannheim LD	Dec 20, 2024	security for costs — no costs-in-principle decision upon successful PI application	Persuasive	Der Spruchkörper schließt sich insoweit der Auffassung der Lokalkammer Düsseldorf (Order vom 31.10.2024, UPC_CFI_368/2024, V.5 (S. 39)) an.