UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 443/2024

Jul 29, 2024·EP3767151 Unitary patent · CABINET LEVELLING APPARATUS

Action number: ACT 43563/2024

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Provisional measures
Category
Provisional measures
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products · Other consumer goods
  • Mechanical engineering
    Mechanical elements
Language
German
First decided
Nov 25, 2024
EPO Opposition
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Preliminary injunction grantedMedian days to first decision
All UPC54% (38/70)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Ulrike VoßLockedLocked
Judge Daniel VossLockedLocked
Judge Walter SchoberLockedLocked
Judge Merja Heikkinen-KeinänenLockedLocked

At the UPC: Häfele SE & Co KG (5 cases)·Kunststoff KG Nehl & Co (3 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-11-25
    Application for provisional measuresPublic

    Summary: The Local Division Munich denied Häfele's application for provisional measures against Kunststoff KG Nehl & Co for alleged infringement of a patent relating to furniture fittings, finding that serious doubts about patent validity (inventive step, prior art D8) outweighed the likelihood of success and that the balance of interests did not favour an injunction.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Provisional measures – balance of interests
    • Inventive step doubts
    • Urgency in provisional measures (R.211.4 RoP)
    • Patent claim interpretation
    • Prosecution history as claim construction tool
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2024-12-16Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-11-25Not public
Measures_DecisionOutcome_Notification.pdf2024-11-25Not public
2024-11-25 - Anordnung - Zurückweisung Antrag auf einstw. Maßnahmen2024-11-25Not public
2024-11-25 - Anordnung - Zurückweisung Antrag auf einstw. Maßnahmen2024-11-25Public
Hearing Reference2024-11-22Not public
Hearing Reference2024-11-22Not public
summons2024-10-15Not public
Stellungnahme vom 14.10.20242024-10-14Not public
Anlage CBH 19 - D19 Zahnrad Wikipedia2024-10-14Not public
Stellungnahme2024-10-04Not public
2024-10-04 Anordnung - Ladung zur mündlichen Verhandlung2024-10-04Public
Template-Order2024-10-04Not public
2024-09-26 - Stellungnahmefrist zum Einspruch und weitere Erwiderungsfrist2024-09-26Not public
Stellungnahme2024-09-24Not public
2024-09-17 Anordnung - Hinweis und Ernennung TQR2024-09-17Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D112024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D17-22024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D17 - 32024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D102024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D13'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D132024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 72024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 14b2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D142024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D18'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D5'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D62024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 032024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D17 - 12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D192024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D02024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D18'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 122024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D6'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 C2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D17 - 2 - 12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 92024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D72024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D72024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 112024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D22024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 52024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D132024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 102024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D122024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D13'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D15'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D42024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 182024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D62024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D152024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D112024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 42024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 132024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 152024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D9'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D182024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 62024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 012024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D17-32024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D02024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 62024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D9'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 042024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D82024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D4'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D22024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 14a2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D14'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D52024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D52024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D5'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 82024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D102024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 022024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 172024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D92024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D92024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D122024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 162024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D14'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D182024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 72024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 22024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D32024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D42024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 32024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D162024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D192024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D82024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D142024-09-12Not public
Einspruch Antragsgegnerin2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 A2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D152024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D15'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D17-12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D17 -22024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D32024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D6'2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 B2024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 17 - 5 - D162024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 82024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 16 D17-2-12024-09-12Not public
Anlage CBH 12024-09-12Not public
Notification Of Service2024-08-21Not public
Zustellnachweis2024-08-21Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-08-16Not public
Letter for Service2024-08-08Not public
2024-08-08 Anordnung Unterlagen zwecks ZU an AG einzureichen2024-08-08Public
2024-08-08 Anordnung Frist für Einspruch nach R.209 (1)2024-08-08Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-08-08Not public
2024-08-07 Anordnung mit Frist fuer Einspruch gem §.209(1) lit a2024-08-07Public
Template-Order2024-08-07Not public
Stellungnahme2024-08-07Not public
2024-08-06 Frist zur Stellungnahme zu Absicht, AG zu hören, R 209 (4)2024-08-06Not public
2024-08-06 St.-N.-Frist zu Absicht, rechtl Gehör zu gewähren, R 209 (4)2024-08-06Not public
2024-08-06 St.-N.-Frist zu Absicht, rechtl Gehör zu gewähren, R 209 (4)2024-08-06Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-08-06Not public
Anlage ASt252024-08-05Not public
Stellungnahme2024-08-05Not public
2024-08-01 Anordnung mit Frist zur Klarstellung des Antrags2024-08-02Public
Panel-Appointment2024-08-01Not public
Application-For-Measures-Receipt2024-08-01Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-08-01Not public
Anlage ASt112024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt82024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt42024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt202024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt162024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt242024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt12024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt212024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt172024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt32024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt192024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt102024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt152024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt92024-07-31Not public
Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Verfügung2024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt62024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt142024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt182024-07-31Not public
Schriftsatz2024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt72024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt52024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt122024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt22024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt222024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt232024-07-31Not public
Anlage ASt132024-07-31Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2024-07-26Not public
Application-For-Measures-Acknowledgement2024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt132024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt202024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt102024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt122024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt222024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt112024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt92024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt162024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt82024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt152024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt182024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt22024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt232024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt52024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt42024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt212024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt72024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt242024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt12024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt62024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt192024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt32024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt172024-07-26Not public
Anlage ASt142024-07-26Not public
Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Verfügung2024-07-26Not public
Plain-English summary

Häfele SE & Co KG sought provisional measures against Kunststoff KG Nehl & Co before the Munich Local Division for alleged infringement of a patent relating to a motorised tool for adjusting height-adjustable furniture legs. The court denied the injunction, finding serious doubts about patent validity because prior art D8 (and D9) plausibly disclosed the key feature distinguishing the patent (motor positioned between handle and drive element), and rejecting the claimant's reliance on the EPO's different claim construction as inadmissible prosecution history. The balance of interests accordingly did not favour provisional relief.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • Patent validity is doubtful in light of prior art D8 disclosing features 1.1 to 3.2.1 and 4 to 6 of claim 1, and possibly also feature 3.2.2 (motor positioned between handle and drive element)

    RespondentLegal basis: Novelty / inventive step under EPC

    Note: Court found serious doubts about inventive step/novelty of the asserted patent given D8's disclosure, meaning the balance of interests did not favour an injunction.

  • Balance of interests does not favour provisional injunction where there are serious doubts about patent validity and probability of erroneous decision is material

    RespondentLegal basis: R. 211 RoP; R. 211.4 RoP

    Note: Court held the probability of error and the interests of defendant in not being subject to an erroneous injunction outweighed claimant's interests in interim protection.

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • Application for provisional measures for infringement of patent relating to furniture fittings (height-adjustable leg installation tool)

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 211 RoP

    Reason: Court found serious doubts as to patent validity based on prior art D8 (and D9), which plausibly disclosed feature 3.2.2 (motor between handle and drive element); these doubts outweighed the likelihood of success and meant the balance of interests did not favour Häfele.

  • EPO Examining Division's view (expressed during third-party observation proceedings) that D8 did not disclose feature 3.2.2 settles the claim construction question

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 69 EPC; prosecution history exclusion from claim construction

    Reason: Court held that the EPO Examining Division's statement does not resolve doubts because it appeared to apply a different claim construction linked to a deleted passage in the description, and the EPO's view is not binding on the UPC in invalidity proceedings.

Prior art relied on
References cited and the role they played.
  • D8Novelty-destroying
  • ITRE 20100070 A1 (D9)Novelty-destroying
Claim construction notes

The patent claimed a tool for installing height-adjustable furniture legs, with claim 1 requiring (inter alia) a motor positioned between the handle and the drive element (feature 3.2.2). The Munich Local Division held that D8's figures 1 and 2 plausibly disclose this feature: the housing (grip) extends axially beyond the motor, the rearmost part of the housing can reasonably be construed as the handle, and the motor is thus positioned between handle and drive element. The court rejected the EPO Examining Division's narrower construction (apparently based on a deleted description alternative) and held that prosecution history is generally inadmissible under Art. 69 EPC.