UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 513/2024

Sep 5, 2024·EP1998604 · REVERSIBLE TOOL FOR AGRICULTURAL SUBSOILERS AND THE LIKE

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent infringed)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
  • Davide Locas
Respondents
Division
Milan CD
Technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Other special machines
Language
English
First decided
May 15, 2025
Last decision
Jun 25, 2025
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Milan CDLockedLocked
Judge Andrea PostiglioneLockedLocked
Judge Anna-Lena KleinLockedLocked
Judge Bernard LedeboerLockedLocked

At the UPC: Maschio Gaspardo S.p.A. (2 cases)·Spiridonakis Bros GP (1 case)

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 2433/2026

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Milan CD·2024

Decisions
  • 2025-06-25
    Decision By DefaultPublic

    Summary: The Milan Central Division issued a decision by default against Spiridonakis Bros GP (Greece) in favour of Maschio Gaspardo S.p.A. (Italy) concerning EP 1 998 604 (agricultural reversible subsoiler tools). The defendant failed to enter proceedings. The Court found that the 'Bellota tool' sold by Spiridonakis constituted infringement of claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the patent. The Court issued a permanent injunction against further infringement in Italy, Germany, France, Romania and Bulgaria with a EUR 500 per-set penalty, ordered disclosure of distribution chain information (EUR 100/day penalty for non-compliance), and awarded EUR 25,000 for legal costs plus reimbursement of court fees. The Court applied the 'double territoriality' requirement of Art. 26 UPCA, finding that an offer and the act of putting into effect need not occur in the same Contracting Member State for bundle patents.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Decision by default under R. 355.2 RoP
    • Double territoriality requirement under Art. 26 UPCA
    • Permanent injunction under Art. 63(1) UPCA
    • Disclosure of information about distribution channels
    • Legal costs in default proceedings
  • 2025-05-15

    Summary: The Milan Central Division ordered an on-site inspection at Maschio Gaspardo's premises (rather than at the court) for an agricultural tool used as the patented and allegedly infringing embodiment, as transporting the approximately 2-tonne subsoiler machine to court was impractical, relying on Art. 53(f) UPCA and R. 170 RoP.

    Show the legal issues (2)
    • Court inspection of patented and accused embodiments under Art. 53(f) UPCA and R. 170 RoP
    • On-site versus in-court inspection logistics
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2026-07-08Not public
Other Documents2026-07-08Not public
Service Receipt/Service Document2026-07-08Not public
Communication2026-07-01Not public
Other Documents2026-07-01Not public
Communication2026-03-13Not public
Other Documents2026-03-13Not public
Communication2026-03-04Not public
Other Documents2026-03-04Not public
Communication2026-02-24Not public