Overview · Filed: Jun 13, 2025
UPC_CFI_515/2025
LOGIC CIRCUITRY
Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresDusseldorf LDProvisional measuresCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 6
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 206 | application for provisional measures | Binding | SUBJECT: R. 206 RoP – Application for provisional measures |
| 275.2 | alternative service / order of good service | Binding | Pursuant to R. 275.2 RoP, on a reasoned request by the claimant, the Court may order that steps already taken to bring the statement of claim to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method or at an alternative place is good service. |
| 209.1 | invitation to lodge an objection in PI proceedings | Binding | must apply all the more so for the Defendant's information about the application for provisional measures and its invitation to lodge an objection (R. 209.1(a) RoP; UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 12 – HP v Zhuhai). |
| 270 | formal service methods exhausted | Background | the Düsseldorf Local Division has exhausted all available means of formal service which are provided by Rules 270 to 274 RoP. |
| 206 | application for provisional measures | Binding | SUBJECT: R. 206 RoP – Application for provisional measures |
| 275.2 | order of good service / alternative service | Binding | steps already taken to bring the application for provisional measures in UPC_CFI_515/2025 to the attention of Defendant 2. constitute good service pursuant to R. 275.2 RoP |
UPC (CFI) · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_449/2025 | alternative service applicable to PI proceedings | Binding | must apply all the more so for the Defendant's information about the application for provisional measures and its invitation to lodge an objection (R. 209.1(a) RoP; UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 12 – HP v Zhuhai). |
| UPC_CFI_449/2025 | good service under R. 275.2 RoP where Chinese authorities failed to serve | Binding | it is justified to consider the steps taken so far as proper service in accordance with R. 275.2 RoP (continuation of UPC_CFI_449/2025 (LD Düsseldorf), Order of 16 October 2025, mn. 24 – HP v Zhuhai; with regard to the refusal of service due to f |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.