UPC CFI 539/2024
Sep 24, 2024·EP3212356 · SHAPED SAW WIRE WITH CONTROLLED CURVATURE AT BENDS
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionGenericCategoryEvidence and inspection
- Parties
- Claimants
- Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord Co., LtdOperating co.
Representatives- Matthias Hülsewig-Preu Bohlig & Partner
- Wasilis Koukounissupporting-Michalski Hüttermann & Partner Patentanwälte mbB
Respondents- Siltronic AGOperating co.
- Hinterberger GmbH & Co KGOperating co.
Representatives- Holger Stratmann-Hoffmann Eitle
- Vocke-Hoffmann Eitle
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringMachine tools · Other special machines
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Nov 19, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Ronny Thomas | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
| Judge Tatyana Zhilova | Locked |
At the UPC: Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord Co., Ltd (3 cases)·Siltronic AG (2 cases)
This dispute contains 1 other proceedings
2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
- 2025-11-19Application RoP262APublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on the partial release of an expert inspection report to Bekaert Binjiang (claimant), ordering redaction of trade secrets (prices, quantities, customer bank details) that were irrelevant to the infringement question, while authorising disclosure of technically relevant information such as wire coating characteristics.
Show the legal issues (3)
- R. 262A RoP release of expert inspection report
- Art. 58 UPCA trade secrets and confidential information
- Proportionate disclosure - prices, quantities, bank details vs. technical data
- 2025-04-16Request to review an order ex-partePublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division ruled on Siltronic AG's application for review of an ex parte preservation of evidence and inspection order (R. 197.3 and .4 RoP) obtained by Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord Co. against Siltronic AG and Hinterberger GmbH & Co. KG concerning EP 3 212 356 B1. The court confirmed that a preservation order may encompass the seizure of delivery notes and invoices, that the list in R. 196.1 is not exhaustive, and that such measures may be used to gather evidence of individual acts of use. The court upheld the order in substance.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Review of preservation of evidence and inspection order (R. 197.3-4 RoP)
- Scope of preservation order – non-exhaustive list in R. 196.1 RoP
- Seizure of invoices and delivery notes
- Evidence of individual acts of infringement (Art. 25 UPCA)
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Exhibit document Claimant | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Exhibit document Claimant | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Exhibit document Claimant | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-11-25 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-11-24 | Not public |
| Order | 2025-11-24 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2025-11-21 | Not public |