UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 684/2024

Nov 14, 2024·EP1651838 · GLAZING SYSTEM

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent upheld as granted)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
  • Martin Luten
  • Michiel Rijsdijk
  • M.j. Bosma
  • M.h. Luten
  • D.e. Colenbrander
Respondents
Representatives
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Other fields
    Civil engineering
Language
English
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Stefan JohanssonLockedLocked
Judge Paolo CrippaLockedLocked

At the UPC: MAARS PROJECTEN B.V. (3 cases)·CITY GLASS AND GLAZING PRIVATE LIMITED (3 cases)

Decisions
  • —
    infringement

    Summary: In the main infringement claim: A. Dismisses the orders sought by City Glass; In the counterclaim for revocation: B. Dismisses the orders sought by Maars; In both the infringement action and the counterclaim: C. Orders City Glass to pay legal costs and court fees incurred by Maars of EUR 24,500,- within three weeks;

Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-02-26Not public
Interim-Conference-Decision2025-05-08Not public
Written-Procedure-Closure2025-05-02Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-28Not public
Rejoinder to the Reply to Defence to Counterclaim for Revocation2025-04-28Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-03-27Not public
Exhibit MAR-13. Drawings of the assembly of the system of NZ’5622025-03-27Not public
Exhibit MAR-14. Drawings of the assembly of the system of US'2052025-03-27Not public
Exhibit MAR-15. Drawings of the assembly of the system of DE'0872025-03-27Not public
2025.03.27 Rejoinder to the Reply and Reply to Defence to Revocation - Maars et al. v City Glass2025-03-27Not public
Exhibit MAR-16. US 4539243 A2025-03-27Not public
Exhibit MAR-17. Annex to the Communication from the Examining Division pursuant to Art. 94(3) EPC2025-03-27Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-02-28Not public
Hearing-Dates2025-02-20Not public
setting dates2025-02-20Public
Hearing-Dates2025-02-20Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-01-28Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-01-28Not public
CIT-18_Schenck Rotec v Universal Balancing2025-01-28Not public
Reply to Defence and Defence to Counterclaim for Revocation2025-01-28Not public
CIT-17_Collingwood v Aurora2025-01-28Not public
Notification Of Service2024-11-28Not public
communicationCheck2024-11-20Not public
Document from EPO2024-11-19Not public
Letter-for-Service2024-11-19Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-11-19Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2024-11-18Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-18Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-11-18Not public
2024.11.14 Statement of Defence including Counterclaim for Revocation - Maars Holding B.V. et al v City Glass2024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-9. Response letter from Applicant dated 16-06-20102024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-10. NZ 198562 A2024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-8. Amended Claim 1 as filed on 25-11-20092024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-3. Cease and desist letter to Maars Middle East FZE dated 15-11-20222024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-1. Declaration of Mr. E. Boschman dated 08-11-20242024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-11. US 3155205 A2024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-12. DE 2452087 A12024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-5. Response letter to SA IP dated 08-12-20222024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-6. Correspondence with SA IP between 25 November and 26 December 20222024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-4. Correspondence with SA IP dated 25-11-20222024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-7. Amended Claim 1 as filed on 16-06-20102024-11-14Not public
Exhibit MAR-2. Screenshots website City Glass2024-11-14Not public