UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed: —

UPC_CFI_692/2026

Provisional measuresProvisional MeasuresDusseldorf LDApplication for provisional measures—
OverviewDecisionsReasoningCitationsDocumentsTimeline
Coverage: Thin.Reasoning extracted with limited coverage — see decisions tab for full text.
Plain-English summary

beMatrix NV obtained an ex parte preliminary injunction from the Düsseldorf Local Division against Yaham Recience Technology Co. Ltd. during the EuroShop 2026 trade fair in Düsseldorf, for infringement of EP 3 757 442 B1 (a display module for modular temporary exhibition stands with LED screens). A penalty of up to EUR 400,000 was ordered for non-compliance. A clerical error in the order naming the applicant instead of the defendant was corrected on the same day under R. 353 RoP.

Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.

  • Ex parte preliminary injunction warranted for patent infringement at EuroShop trade fair

    ClaimantLegal basis: R. 209.1, 212 RoP

    Note: Düsseldorf LD granted an ex parte PI against Yaham Recience Technology exhibiting at EuroShop trade fair for infringement of EP 3 757 442 B1 (LED display module).

Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

No rejected arguments captured.

Key legal principles
Doctrines and rules cited in the reasoning.
Ex parte provisional measures available at trade fair exhibitions for urgent patent infringementRectification of clerical errors under R. 353 RoP where wrong party named in order

Browse other cases on this principle.