UPC_CFI_716/2024

Premixed burner

InfringementMain Infringement ActionMannheim LDInfringementCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
118.5	costs — recoverable costs	Binding	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the Infringement action and the Counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.
30	claim amendment — application linked to defence to counterclaim for revocation	Background	Since an Application to amend the patent pursuant to R. 30 RoP is linked to the Defence to the CCR, said new time period also applies to a potential Application to amend the patent.
262A	confidential information — access to unredacted version delayed	Background	access to the unredacted version of the SoD was delayed under Rule 262A RoP.
262A	confidential information — access to unredacted pleadings	Binding	After a final order pursuant to R. 262A RoP has been issued, Claimant itself was given access to the unredacted version on 19 March 2025.
30	claim amendment — application to amend patent linked to Defence to CCR	Binding	Since an Application to amend the patent pursuant to R. 30 RoP is linked to the Defence to the CCR, said new time period also applies to a potential Application to amend the patent.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
EPO_BoA_unspecified	patent validity — upheld in limited form after opposition/appeal before EPO BoA	Background	It was upheld in limited form in opposition proceedings (cf. B2-patent specification (exhibit B&B1), decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Patent office (exhibits BP 2, 4))

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
69(1)	costs — based on Art. 69 UPCA and R. 118.5 RoP	Binding	The decision on the (recoverable) costs with regard to both the Infringement action and the Counterclaim for revocation is based on Art. 69 (1) UPCA, R. 118.5 RoP.

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.