Overview · Filed: Jun 6, 2023
UPC_CFI_75/2023
METHOD OF PRODUCING RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELL
RevocationMain Revocation ActionMunich CDRevocationCase ClosedSettled at: Pre-merits
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 12
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| RoP_rule_262.1b | language regime — public access requires concrete legitimate reason; education/training insufficient | Binding | Rule 262.1(b) RoP requires a concrete and verifiable, legitimate reason for making available written pleadings and evidence upon a request by a member of the public. |
| RoP_rule_262.1a | language regime — distinction between automatic publication and public access on request | Binding | The Applicant submitted that the distinction between Rule 262.1(a) and Rule 262.1(b) RoP simply provides the mechanism for avoiding the publication of all pleadings and evidence |
| RoP_rule_4.1 | language regime — obligation to use CMS dedicated workflows | Binding | Parties are under an obligation to use the CMS and the dedicated workflows in the CMS to file their submissions (see e.g. Rule 4.1 RoP). |
| RoP_rule_278.1 | language regime — notification generated by system as means of electronic communication | Binding | The notification generated by the system is the "means of electronic communication" as meant in Rule 278.1 RoP |
| RoP_rule_271.6 | language regime — relevant electronic message for service | Binding | or, as the case may be, the "relevant electronic message" as meant in Rule 271.6 RoP. |
| RoP_rule_28 | language regime — order dated 25 October 2023 | Binding | With reference to the Court's Rule 28 RoP order dated 25 October 2023 and the invitation to the interim conference dated 22 February 2024 |
| RoP_rule_105.1 | language regime — interim conference by video conference | Binding | an interim conference was held on 13 March 2024 by video conference (Rule 105.1 RoP). |
| RoP_rule_105.5 | language regime — order following interim conference | Binding | Rule 105.5 RoP Order of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court delivered on 18/03/2024 |
| RoP_rule_9.1 | language regime — court discretion to admit additional submission | Binding | The Claimants request that the Court exercises the discretion provided by Rule 9.1 RoP to make a procedural order that their letter dated 15 January 2024 ... be admitted into the proceedings |
| RoP_rule_365 | jurisdiction — settlement without requiring confirmatory court decision | Binding | The parties to proceedings may at any time conclude their action by way of settlement, also without seeking a confirmatory Court decision as meant in Rule 365 RoP. |
| RoP_rule_360 | jurisdiction — disposal of action devoid of purpose by unanimous application | Binding | Actions are disposed of by way of order as the parties have made a unanimous application under Rule 360 RoP declaring that they concluded their actions by way of settlement |
| RoP_rule_370.9c | security for costs — court fee reimbursement on settlement | Binding | Reimbursement of Court fees pursuant to Rule 370.9 sub c RoP is not limited to concluding a case by way of settlement within the meaning of Rule 365 RoP. |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.