View all cases
UPC CFI 869/2025
—·EP3805415: METAL PLATE FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING METAL PLATE, DEPOSITION MASK AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK
SEP (unclear)
- Case details
- Status—ActionCounterclaim for revocationCategoryCounter Claim for Revocation
- Parties
- ClaimantsReps: Soenke Fock (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Thorben Strich (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Jan-Caspar Maiers (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Alex-Christian Lesch (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Dr.-Ing. Jochen Kapfenberger (Cohausz & Florack); Georg Tully (Cohausz & Florack); Frederik Tenholt (Cohausz & Florack)RespondentsReps: Holger Stratmann (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB); Henrik Vocke (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB); Philipp Zambelli (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB)
- Division
- —
- Judges
- Tatyana Zhilova · rapporteur
- Technology
- Semiconductor Devices
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 28, 2026
Decisions
- 2026-04-28Procedural onlyProceduralCounterclaim for revocation
The rapporteur deferred the claimant's lateness objection (R. 9.2 RoP) regarding allegedly new factual submissions in the respondents' reply brief on the amendment request, ruling it a substantive matter for the full panel to decide at or after the oral hearing. The claimant was granted three weeks (until 19 May 2026) to respond to the contested submissions in the interest of equality of arms, after which the written procedure is closed.
Legal issues:Admissibility of allegedly late factual submissions under R. 9.2 RoPPermission for further written submissions under R. 36 RoPEquality of arms in written procedure
Documents
- Anordnung_R36_869_2025.pdf2026-04-28DE