UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 869/2025

·EP3805415: METAL PLATE FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING METAL PLATE, DEPOSITION MASK AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DEPOSITION MASK

SEP (unklar)
Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Widerklage Nichtigkeit
Kategorie
Widerklage auf Nichtigkeit
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Soenke Fock (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Thorben Strich (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Jan-Caspar Maiers (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Alex-Christian Lesch (Wildanger Kehrwald Graf von Schwerin & Partner mbB); Dr.-Ing. Jochen Kapfenberger (Cohausz & Florack); Georg Tully (Cohausz & Florack); Frederik Tenholt (Cohausz & Florack)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Holger Stratmann (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB); Henrik Vocke (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB); Philipp Zambelli (HOFFMANN EITLE Patent- und Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbB)
Division
Richter
Technology
Semiconductor Devices
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
28. Apr. 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-04-28
    Nur prozessualProzessualCounterclaim for revocation

    The rapporteur deferred the claimant's lateness objection (R. 9.2 RoP) regarding allegedly new factual submissions in the respondents' reply brief on the amendment request, ruling it a substantive matter for the full panel to decide at or after the oral hearing. The claimant was granted three weeks (until 19 May 2026) to respond to the contested submissions in the interest of equality of arms, after which the written procedure is closed.

    Rechtsfragen:Admissibility of allegedly late factual submissions under R. 9.2 RoPPermission for further written submissions under R. 36 RoPEquality of arms in written procedure
Dokumente
  • Anordnung_R36_869_2025.pdf2026-04-28DE