UPC CoA 101/2024
Feb 29, 2024·EP2697391 · METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Curio Bioscience Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Cameron Marshall-Carpmaels & Ransford
- Agathe Michel-De Cazotte-Carpmaels & Ransford
Respondents- 10x Genomics, Inc.Operating co.
Representatives- Tilman Mueller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Axel B. Berger-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- ChemistryBiotechnology
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Mar 28, 2024
- Last decision
- Apr 17, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
| Judge Patricia Rombach | Locked |
At the UPC: Curio Bioscience Inc. (19 cases)·10x Genomics, Inc. (40 cases)
This dispute contains 18 other proceedings
UPC CFI 657/2025·UPC CFI 658/2025·UPC CoA 805/2024·UPC CoA 810/2024·UPC CoA 234/2024 and 13 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2024-04-17Appeal RoP220.1Public
Summary: The UPC Court of Appeal upheld the President of the Court of First Instance's refusal to change the language of proceedings from German to English in 10x Genomics' provisional measures application against Curio Bioscience concerning EP2697391, finding that the interests of the parties were balanced and the defendant's position was the decisive factor.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Change of language of proceedings (Art. 49(5) UPCA)
- Fairness in language selection
- Defendant's position as decisive factor in balanced cases
- 2024-03-28
Summary: Order of the Court of Appeal (Panel 2) on an application by Curio Bioscience Inc. for restriction of access to confidential information under Rule 262A RoP. Curio sought to limit access to an unredacted document (CR-3) in the context of a pending language-change appeal. The Court held that a first-instance Rule 262A order restricting access to certain documents retains its force during appeal proceedings even if not directly challenged on appeal, and continues to govern access until the conclusion of the entire proceedings. Access to the confidential document was maintained restricted to specified persons.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Duration and effect of Rule 262A confidentiality order during appeal
- Access restriction to confidential information across proceedings stages
- Language change application and its interaction with confidentiality orders
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2025-02-26 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-14 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-14 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-07 | Not public |
| Close workflow | 2025-02-07 | Public |
| Close workflow | 2025-02-07 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-04 | Not public |
| Schriftsatz | 2024-07-01 | Not public |