UPC CoA 153/2025
Feb 24, 2025·EP2839083 · PILE SHOE
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Tiroler Rohre GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Florian Robl-Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte
Respondents- SSAB Swedish Steel GmbHOperating co.
- SSAB Europe OyOperating co.
Representatives- Christian Meyer-Maiwald
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Other fieldsCivil engineering
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Jul 3, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
At the UPC: Tiroler Rohre GmbH (7 cases)·SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH (7 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CFI 598/2025·UPC CFI 640/2024·UPC CFI 487/2024·UPC CFI 324/2024·UPC CFI 98/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2025-07-03Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed Tiroler Rohre's appeal against the Munich Local Division's cost order following withdrawal of its application for provisional measures. The Court held that the ordinary cost rules (R. 150 et seq. RoP) apply to cost decisions following withdrawal under R. 265 RoP; no special rule applies requiring reference to the panel rather than the standing judge. The legal review on appeal is limited to a marginal review of whether costs awarded are reasonable and proportionate (Art. 69(1) UPCA). The judge-rapporteur's detailed cost assessment showed no such deviation.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Costs following withdrawal of provisional measures application (R. 265 RoP; R. 150 RoP)
- Leave to appeal a cost decision (R. 221 RoP)
- Standard of review for cost decisions on appeal
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-07-22 | Not public |
| Application-For-Costs-Decision-Outcome | 2025-07-08 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-07-08 | Not public |
| Anordnung | 2025-07-03 | Public |
| Zustimmung | 2025-04-14 | Not public |
| Comment pursuant to RoP 264 | 2025-04-11 | Not public |
| Comment pursuant to RoP 264 | 2025-04-11 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme | 2025-04-10 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-04-03 | Not public |
| Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome | 2025-04-03 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2025-03-26 | Not public |
| Berufung | 2025-03-26 | Not public |
| Anordnung | 2025-03-26 | Public |
| Template-Order | 2025-03-26 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-03-26 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 1 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 3 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 2 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Berufungserwiderung | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 4 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 2 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 1 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 3 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anlage MW KFA 4 | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Berufungserwiderung | 2025-03-21 | Not public |
| Anordnung | 2025-03-07 | Public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2025-02-26 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-02-26 | Not public |
| Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome | 2025-02-26 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Antrag auf Zulassung der Berufung gegen Kostenentscheidung betreffend Kostenfestsetzung | 2025-02-24 | Not public |
| Einzahlungsbestätigung Gerichtsgebuehren | 2025-02-24 | Not public |