UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 24. Feb. 2025

UPC_CoA_153/2025

PILE SHOE

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
Parteien

Kläger

  • Tiroler Rohre GmbH
Vertreter: Christian Meyer (Maiwald)

Beklagte

  • SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH
  • SSAB Europe Oy
Vertreter: Florian Robl (Torggler Hofmann)
Richter
  • Ingeborg Simonsson
Patente
  • EP 2 839 083
CPC-Codes: E02D5/665, E02D5/38, E02D5/72
Ausgang
Nur Kosten
Eingereicht: 24. Feb. 2025
Erste Entscheidung:
Sprache: German

The Court of Appeal dismissed Tiroler Rohre's appeal against the Munich Local Division's cost order following withdrawal of its application for provisional measures. The Court held that the ordinary cost rules (R. 150 et seq. RoP) apply to cost decisions following withdrawal under R. 265 RoP; no special rule applies requiring reference to the panel rather than the standing judge. The legal review on appeal is limited to a marginal review of whether costs awarded are reasonable and proportionate (Art. 69(1) UPCA). The judge-rapporteur's detailed cost assessment showed no such deviation.

Im UPC-Register öffnen