UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 640/2024

Dec 13, 2024·EP2839083: PILE SHOE

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Costs Assessments
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Christian Meyer (Maiwald)
Respondents
Reps: Florian Robl (Torggler & Hofmann Patentanwälte)
Division
Munich LD
Language
German
Decisions
  • 2025-02-10
    Costs onlyApplication For Costs

    Decision of the Munich Local Division on a costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung) following withdrawal of an application for provisional measures by SSAB Europe Oy and SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH against Tiroler Rohre GmbH after the oral hearing. The first-instance court had previously ordered Tiroler Rohre (the unsuccessful PI applicant) to bear costs including preparation of the protective brief. The costs decision addressed the reasonableness of hours billed by claimants' legal representatives, making deductions for excessive time entries across multiple tasks (protective brief, main PI proceedings, e-mail correspondence). Allowable costs were calculated for one attorney-at-law, one patent attorney, and a second patent attorney.

    Legal issues:Costs assessment (Kostenfestsetzung)Reasonableness of legal fees in provisional measures proceedingsRecoverability of protective brief preparation costsProportionality of time billed by patent and legal representatives
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Application-For-Costs-Decision-Outcome2025-02-20Not public
Kostenfestsetzung2025-02-10Public
Kostenfestsetzung2025-02-10Public
Stellungnahme zum Kostenfestsetzungsantrag2025-02-04Not public
Stellungnahme zum Kostenfestsetzungsantrag2024-12-13Not public
Stellungnahme zum Kostenfestsetzungsantrag2024-12-13Not public
Stellungnahme zum Kostenfestsetzungsantrag2024-12-13Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-12-13Not public
Receipt2024-12-13Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-04Not public
Kostenfestsetzungsantrag2024-11-01Not public