UPClytics
View all cases
Case details
Status
Case Closed (Claim dismissed)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Language
—
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked

At the UPC: Volkswagen Group (41 cases)·Network System Technologies LLC (77 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-09-18
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed Audi AG's appeal in six consolidated cases challenging the Munich Local Division's refusal to grant preliminary objections under Rule 361 RoP (action manifestly bound to fail) against NST's infringement actions. The court held that R.361 RoP is reserved for clear-cut cases and cannot require the claimant to pre-empt every possible line of defence in the statement of claim. The court also rejected Audi's arguments that opt-outs were invalidly withdrawn, finding the UPC has jurisdiction.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Manifestly inadmissible/bound to fail action under Rule 361 RoP
    • Sufficiency of statement of claim in front-loaded UPC procedure
    • Validity of opt-out withdrawal and UPC jurisdiction
    • Power of attorney for UPC representatives under Art. 48 UPCA and Rule 5.3(b) RoP
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-02-14Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-12-18Not public
WF closure2024-12-18Public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-09-19Not public
DecisionOutcome2024-09-18Not public
Final Order2024-09-18Public
Hearing Reference2024-08-28Not public
Hearing Reference2024-08-28Not public
interimProcedureClosure2024-07-11Not public
summons2024-07-11Not public