UPC_CoA_37/2026

METHOD TO MODIFY ALIGNER BY MODIFYING TOOTH POSITION

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
220.3	jurisdiction	Binding	request for a discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP), Re-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP), Time extension (R. 9.3 (a) RoP)
320	jurisdiction	Binding	Re-establishment of rights (R. 320 RoP), Time extension (R. 9.3 (a) RoP)
9.3(a)	urgency	Binding	According to R. 9.3 (a) RoP, on a reasoned request by a party the Court may extend, even retrospectively, a time period referred to in the Rules of Procedure
9.1	jurisdiction	Binding	the regulatory content of R. 9.1 RoP must be considered. According to this provision, the Court may, on its own motion or upon request, at any stage of the proceedings

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
UPC_CFI_1747/2025	urgency	Background	Procedural Order of 26 February 2026 issued by the Local Division Düsseldorf. Reference numbers: UPC_CFI_1747/2025

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.