UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 388/2024

Jul 4, 2024·EP2713879 · ANALYTE SENSOR DEVICES, CONNECTIONS, AND METHODS

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Settled)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
—
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Marc van der BurgLocked
Judge Patrik RydmanLocked

At the UPC: Sibio Technology Limited (15 cases)·Abbott Group (67 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-08-19

    Summary: The Court of Appeal partially granted Sibio's request for suspensive effect of their appeal, specifically to the extent that the first-instance provisional measures order erroneously covered Ireland (which had not ratified the UPCA and therefore was not a Contracting Member State). The erroneous extension to Ireland was identified as a manifest error.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Suspensive effect of appeal (Article 74 UPCA, Rule 223 RoP)
    • Definition of Contracting Member State under UPCA
    • Ireland's non-ratification of UPCA
    • Manifest error in first-instance order
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-03-06Not public
Decision-On-Appeal-On-Measures-Outcome2025-03-06Not public
Confirmation of settlement2025-03-06Public
Outcome of the Order2025-03-06Not public
Confirmation of settlement2025-03-06Public
Outcome of the Order2025-03-06Not public
Confirmation of settlement2025-03-06Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-03-03Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-03-03Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-03-03Not public