UPC CoA 469/2024
Aug 6, 2024·EP2479680 · Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- AYLO PREMIUM LTDOperating co.
Representatives- Tilman Mueller-Stoy-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Conor McLauglin
- Conor McLaughlin-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- DISH Technologies L.L.C.Operating co.
- Sling TV L.L.C.Operating co.
Representatives- Denise Benz-A&O Shearman
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Aug 21, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
At the UPC: Aylo Group (18 cases)·DISH Technologies L.L.C. (20 cases)
This dispute contains 13 other proceedings
UPC CoA 708/2025·UPC CoA 719/2025·UPC CFI 574/2025·UPC CoA 611/2024·UPC CFI 198/2024 and 8 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 709/2025·UPC CoA 710/2025·UPC CoA 711/2025·UPC CoA 720/2025·CC 26845/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2024-08-21Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed AYLO's request for discretionary review of the Mannheim Local Division's confidentiality order, which had admitted three DISH/Sling-designated persons to the confidentiality club regarding protected business information.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality order (Rule 262A RoP)
- Discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP)
- Confidentiality club membership
- 2024-08-21
Summary: The Court of Appeal's standing judge ruled that AYLO's submission under Rule 9.1 RoP was inadmissible as filed without leave, holding that Rule 9.1 does not confer a right to file unsolicited submissions, and only an application and response are permitted under Rule 220.4 RoP.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Procedural application Rule 9.1 RoP
- Admissibility of unsolicited submissions
- Appeal Rule 220.4 RoP
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-05 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-08-21 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-08-21 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-08-21 | Not public |
| Anordnung | 2024-08-21 | Public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-08-21 | Not public |
| Anordnung | 2024-08-21 | Public |
| Receipt | 2024-08-14 | Not public |
| Regel 9 Antrag | 2024-08-14 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme gem. Regel 264 VO | 2024-08-13 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme gem. Regel 264 VO | 2024-08-13 | Not public |
| Anordnung R.220.4 VerfO | 2024-08-07 | Not public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2024-08-07 | Not public |
| Proof of payment | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Exhibit BP 262A Berufung 04 | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Exhibit BP 262A Berufung 01 | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Exhibit BP 262A Berufung 02 | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Exhibit BP 262A Berufung 03 | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Request for discretionary review RoP 220.3 | 2024-08-06 | Not public |