UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 611/2024

Oct 21, 2024·EP2479680: Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Denise Benz (A&O Shearman)
Respondents
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
First decided
Jan 9, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-01-09
    Costs onlyCostsApplication For Costs

    Order of the Court of Appeal (Panel 2) granting DISH Technologies and Sling TV's application for reimbursement of court fees following their withdrawal of an appeal against a security-for-costs order (EUR 800,000) issued by the Mannheim Local Division. The parties had been misled by an erroneous legal remedy instruction in the first-instance order, which led them to file both a panel review request and a precautionary appeal. The Court of Appeal granted full reimbursement of the appeal fee (EUR 1,500) since the appeal was filed only as a precaution due to the incorrect instruction and was subsequently withdrawn promptly.

    Legal issues:Reimbursement of court fees on withdrawal of appeal (Rule 370.11 RoP)Effect of erroneous legal remedy instruction on party's decision to appealSecurity for costs order (Rule 9)
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-09-24Not public
Workflow kann geschlossen werden2025-04-18Public
Hearing Reference2025-04-18Not public
Hearing Reference2025-04-18Not public
Interim-Procedure-Closure2025-04-18Not public
Summon-Oral-Hearing2025-04-18Not public
KEINE LADUNG ZUM TERMIN2025-04-18Public
Interim-Conference-Decision2025-04-18Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-01-10Not public
Anordnung Gerichtsgebühren2025-01-09Public
Outcome of the Order2024-11-20Not public
Zulassung Rücknahme2024-11-20Public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
Statement Aylo to grounds of appeal2024-11-19Not public
BPV402024-11-19Not public
BPV382024-11-19Not public
BPV392024-11-19Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Submission2024-11-15Not public
Stellungnahme Zulassung Rücknahme2024-11-14Not public
Receipt2024-11-11Not public
Receipt2024-11-11Not public
Rueckerstattung Gerichtsgebuehren2024-11-11Not public
Ruecknahme der Berufung2024-11-11Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-11-05Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-11-04Not public
Receipt2024-11-04Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-11-04Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-10-22Not public
Anlage K22024-10-22Not public
Berufung2024-10-22Not public
Anlage K12024-10-22Not public
Anlage K32024-10-22Not public