UPClytics
EnglishDeutsch
Sign inSign up
View all cases

UPC CoA 51/2026

Apr 8, 2026·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Petri Eskola (Backström & Co Attorneys)
Respondents
Reps: Tilman Muller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
English
First decided
Jun 29, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-06-29
    CostsApplication to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)

    The Court of Appeal denied Suinno's application for leave to appeal the cost decision of the Central Division, Paris dated 31 March 2026, which had ordered Suinno to pay EUR 300,000.00 in costs to Microsoft incurred in the counterclaim for revocation proceedings. The Court of Appeal found that the CFI's cost assessment was proportionate and within the applicable ceiling, and that Suinno had not demonstrated any deviation from the principles of Art. 69(1) UPCA.

    Legal issues:Leave to appeal a cost decision under R. 221 RoPReasonable and proportionate legal costs under Art. 69(1) UPCAScale of ceilings for recoverable costs under R. 152 RoPMarginal review standard for cost decisions on appeal
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-06-29Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2026-06-29Not public
Final Order2026-06-29Public
Receipt2026-04-14Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-14Not public
Document Respondent2026-04-14Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-04-10Not public
Order2026-04-10Public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-04-10Not public
Receipt2026-04-08Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-08Not public
Fee2026-04-08Not public
Proof of entitlement to 50% reduction in court fees2026-04-08Not public
Proof of payment2026-04-08Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2026-04-08Not public