UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 51/2026

8. Apr. 2026·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Petri Eskola (Backström & Co Attorneys)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Tilman Muller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Computing & AI
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
29. Juni 2026
Entscheidungen
  • 2026-06-29
    KostenApplication to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)

    The Court of Appeal denied Suinno's application for leave to appeal the cost decision of the Central Division, Paris dated 31 March 2026, which had ordered Suinno to pay EUR 300,000.00 in costs to Microsoft incurred in the counterclaim for revocation proceedings. The Court of Appeal found that the CFI's cost assessment was proportionate and within the applicable ceiling, and that Suinno had not demonstrated any deviation from the principles of Art. 69(1) UPCA.

    Rechtsfragen:Leave to appeal a cost decision under R. 221 RoPReasonable and proportionate legal costs under Art. 69(1) UPCAScale of ceilings for recoverable costs under R. 152 RoPMarginal review standard for cost decisions on appeal
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-06-29Nicht öffentlich
action.issueDecision.decision2026-06-29Nicht öffentlich
Final Order2026-06-29Öffentlich
Receipt2026-04-14Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-04-14Nicht öffentlich
Document Respondent2026-04-14Nicht öffentlich
action.issueOrder.order2026-04-10Nicht öffentlich
Order2026-04-10Öffentlich
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-04-10Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich
Fee2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich
Proof of entitlement to 50% reduction in court fees2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich
Proof of payment2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2026-04-08Nicht öffentlich