UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 911/2025

Nov 20, 2025·EP2671173 · METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Claim dismissed)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
Language
English
First decided
Nov 24, 2025
Last decision
Dec 24, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Emmanuel GougéLocked

At the UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 cases)·Microsoft Group (34 cases)

Decisions
  • 2025-12-24
    Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)Public

    Summary: The standing judge of the Court of Appeal (Emmanuel Gougé) dismissed Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's application for leave to appeal the Paris Central Division's cost decision of 6 November 2025, which had ordered Suinno to pay EUR 350,000 in costs to Microsoft Corporation in connection with the infringement action UPC_CFI_164/2024 (EP 2 671 173). The CoA found the costs award reasonable and proportionate given the EUR 5,000,000 case value and EUR 600,000 ceiling, and that Suinno did not demonstrate that the first-instance court's assessment was wrong.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Leave to appeal a cost decision (R. 221 RoP)
    • Proportionality and reasonableness of costs award
    • Scale of ceilings for recoverable costs
    • Assessment of value of infringement action (R. 370.6 RoP)
  • 2025-11-24
    Application RoP 223Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal dismissed Suinno's application for suspensive effect of its appeal (related to costs decisions made against Suinno by the Paris Central Division following a default decision dismissing Suinno's infringement action against Microsoft). The CoA held that Suinno had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances nor that the impugned costs decisions were manifestly erroneous.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Suspensive effect of appeal on costs decisions (R.223 RoP)
    • Manifest error standard
    • Enforcement of costs decisions pending appeal
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-12-24Not public
Decision2025-12-24Not public
Final Order2025-12-24Public
Cover sheet2025-12-03Not public
Statement of Response2025-12-03Not public
Receipt2025-12-03Not public
Order2025-11-24Not public
Order2025-11-24Public
Order2025-11-24Not public
Order2025-11-24Public