UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 911/2025

Nov 20, 2025·EP2671173 +1 more: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Petri Eskola (Backström & Co)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
English
First decided
Nov 24, 2025
Last decision
Dec 24, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-12-24
    DismissedCostsApplication to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)

    The standing judge of the Court of Appeal (Emmanuel Gougé) dismissed Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's application for leave to appeal the Paris Central Division's cost decision of 6 November 2025, which had ordered Suinno to pay EUR 350,000 in costs to Microsoft Corporation in connection with the infringement action UPC_CFI_164/2024 (EP 2 671 173). The CoA found the costs award reasonable and proportionate given the EUR 5,000,000 case value and EUR 600,000 ceiling, and that Suinno did not demonstrate that the first-instance court's assessment was wrong.

    Legal issues:Leave to appeal a cost decision (R. 221 RoP)Proportionality and reasonableness of costs awardScale of ceilings for recoverable costsAssessment of value of infringement action (R. 370.6 RoP)
  • 2025-11-24
    DismissedApplication Rop 223

    Court of Appeal dismissed Suinno's application for suspensive effect of its appeal (related to costs decisions made against Suinno by the Paris Central Division following a default decision dismissing Suinno's infringement action against Microsoft). The CoA held that Suinno had not demonstrated exceptional circumstances nor that the impugned costs decisions were manifestly erroneous.

    Legal issues:Suspensive effect of appeal on costs decisions (R.223 RoP)Manifest error standardEnforcement of costs decisions pending appeal
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-12-24Not public
action.issueDecision.decision2025-12-24Not public
Final Order2025-12-24Public
Cover sheet2025-12-03Not public
Statement of Response2025-12-03Not public
Receipt2025-12-03Not public
action.issueOrder.order2025-11-24Not public
Order2025-11-24Public
action.issueOrder.order2025-11-24Not public
Order2025-11-24Public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2025-11-21Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-20Not public
Other document Appellant2025-11-20Not public
Receipt2025-11-20Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-20Not public
Other document Appellant2025-11-20Not public
Other document Appellant2025-11-20Not public
Receipt2025-11-20Not public
Formal Deficiency found2025-11-20Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-19Not public
Fee2025-11-19Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2025-11-19Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2025-11-19Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2025-11-19Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2025-11-19Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2025-11-19Not public
Proof of entitlement to 40% reduction in court fees2025-11-19Not public
Receipt2025-11-19Not public
Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing… v Microsoft Corporation — UPC CoA 911/2025 | UPClytics