UPC CoA 86/2024
Feb 27, 2024·EP2207270 SEP · WIRELESS COMMUNICATION BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION MOBILE STATION APPARATUS AND CONTROL CHANNEL ALLOCATION METHOD
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Respondents
- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Odiporo GmbHOperating co.
- Shamrock Mobile GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Corin Gittinger-Freshfields
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Language
- German
- First decided
- Apr 9, 2024
- Last decision
- Aug 6, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Rian Kalden | Locked |
| Judge Patricia Rombach | Locked |
| Judge Ingeborg Simonsson | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
This dispute contains 7 other proceedings
UPC CoA 543/2024·CC 594274/2023·UPC CFI 223/2023·ORD 25608/2024·ORD 7585/2024 and 2 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 1354/2024·UPC CoA 472/2023·UPC CFI 222/2023·UPC CFI 333/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2024-08-06Appeal RoP220.2Public
Summary: Court of Appeal ruled on service of statement of claim on defendants in China and Hong Kong. Held that Chinese and Hong Kong defendants cannot be served via group companies in Contracting Member States. Service via the Hague Convention must normally be attempted first before alternative methods under R.275 RoP are permitted. No ruling on infringement merits.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Service of statement of claim on defendants in China and Hong Kong
- Hague Convention service
- Alternative service under R.275 RoP
- Corporate group separation principle
- 2024-04-09
Summary: The Court of Appeal issued an order clarifying the date of service for appeal documents, establishing that service rules applicable at first instance continue to apply at the appeal level in proceedings involving Panasonic and the Xiaomi group entities.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Service of appeal documents (R. 270-279 RoP)
- Electronic service via CMS
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated | 2025-06-12 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-02-19 | Not public |
| Close workflow | 2025-02-19 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-02-14 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-12-18 | Not public |
| WF closure | 2024-12-18 | Public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-08-06 | Not public |
| DecisionOutcome | 2024-08-06 | Not public |