UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 469/2024

Aug 6, 2024·EP2479680 · Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology · Digital communication · Computer technology
Language
German
First decided
Aug 21, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked

At the UPC: Aylo Group (18 cases)·DISH Technologies L.L.C. (20 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-08-21
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal dismissed AYLO's request for discretionary review of the Mannheim Local Division's confidentiality order, which had admitted three DISH/Sling-designated persons to the confidentiality club regarding protected business information.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Confidentiality order (Rule 262A RoP)
    • Discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP)
    • Confidentiality club membership
  • 2024-08-21

    Summary: The Court of Appeal's standing judge ruled that AYLO's submission under Rule 9.1 RoP was inadmissible as filed without leave, holding that Rule 9.1 does not confer a right to file unsolicited submissions, and only an application and response are permitted under Rule 220.4 RoP.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Procedural application Rule 9.1 RoP
    • Admissibility of unsolicited submissions
    • Appeal Rule 220.4 RoP
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-02-05Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-08-21Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-08-21Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-08-21Not public
Anordnung2024-08-21Public
Outcome of the Order2024-08-21Not public
Anordnung2024-08-21Public
Receipt2024-08-14Not public
Regel 9 Antrag2024-08-14Not public