Overview · Filed: —
UPC_CoA_69/2024
Video decoding device, video decoding method, and program
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 6
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 274 | jurisdiction | Binding | urt of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court issued on 29 July 2024 concerning service of a Statement of claim on defendants in China and Hong Kong (R.273 and R.274 RoP) HEADNOTE - A defendant company in China or Hong Kong cannot be served a St |
| 274.1(b) | jurisdiction | Binding | mpts to serve in China by any method provided for by the Hague Convention pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service by other means (R.274.1(b) RoP) or by alternative methods or at an alternative place (R.275 RoP) is permi |
| 275 | jurisdiction | Binding | on pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service by other means (R.274.1(b) RoP) or by alternative methods or at an alternative place (R.275 RoP) is permitted. KEYWORDS - Service, Regulation (EU) 2020/1784, the Hague Co |
| 275.1 | jurisdiction | Binding | Statements of claim. 2. NEC requested that service of the Statements of claim on the Asian TCL companies would be effected by e-mail to Mr pursuant to R.275.1 RoP; or by public service in the form of a written notice to be displayed in the |
| 275.2 | jurisdiction | Binding | hat steps already taken to bring the Statement of claim to the attention of the defendant by an alternative method or at an alternative place is good service (R.275.2 RoP) 28. Article 15.2 of the Hague Convention provides that each Contracting St |
| 274.1 | jurisdiction | Binding | 30. The Asian TCL companies are companies with registered offices outside the Contracting Member States and outside the EU. Service is governed by R.273 and R.274.1 RoP. Regulation 2020/1784 does not apply to them, which means that the conditions f |
UPC Court of Appeal · 4
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_69/2024 | procedural | Binding | w Territories, Hong Kong (hereinafter jointly referred to as the Asian TCL companies) LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS English UPC Court of Appeal UPC_CoA_69/2024 APL_8972/2024 UPC_CoA_70/2024 APL_8977/2024 2 PANEL AND DECIDING |
| UPC_CoA_70/2024 | procedural | Binding | einafter jointly referred to as the Asian TCL companies) LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS English UPC Court of Appeal UPC_CoA_69/2024 APL_8972/2024 UPC_CoA_70/2024 APL_8977/2024 2 PANEL AND DECIDING JUDGES This order has been issu |
| UPC_CoA_8972/2024 | procedural | Background | ng Kong (hereinafter jointly referred to as the Asian TCL companies) LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS English UPC Court of Appeal UPC_CoA_69/2024 APL_8972/2024 UPC_CoA_70/2024 APL_8977/2024 2 PANEL AND DECIDING JUDGES This orde |
| UPC_CoA_8977/2024 | procedural | Background | referred to as the Asian TCL companies) LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS English UPC Court of Appeal UPC_CoA_69/2024 APL_8972/2024 UPC_CoA_70/2024 APL_8977/2024 2 PANEL AND DECIDING JUDGES This order has been issued by the second |
UPC (CFI) · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_487/2023 | procedural | Binding | FIRST INSTANCE □ Date: 5 February 2024 □ Order ORD_6237/2024 of the Munich Local Division, concerning App_3482/2024 in the main proceedings ACT_595922/2023; UPC_CFI_487/2023 □ Order ORD_6607/2024 of the Munich Local Division, concerning App_3481/ |
| UPC_CFI_498/2023 | jurisdiction | Binding | ings ACT_595922/2023; UPC_CFI_487/2023 □ Order ORD_6607/2024 of the Munich Local Division, concerning App_3481/2024 in the main proceedings ACT_596658/2023; UPC_CFI_498/2023 ORAL HEARING 6 June 2024 PATENTS IN SUIT EP 2 645 714 and EP 3 0 |
courtName.other · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hague Service Convention | jurisdiction | Binding | notice to be displayed in the publicly accessible premises of a UPC Local Division at this stage. Attempts to serve in China by any method provided for by the Hague Convention pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service by |
| Regulation (EU) 2020/1784 (EU Service Regulation) | jurisdiction | Binding | layed in the publicly accessible premises of the Munich L [LAST PAGES] 6 are not Contracting Member States will normally be carried out in accordance with Regulation 2020/1784. 26. R.274.1(b) RoP provides for service by any method permitted |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
| Cited in | Date | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_509/2023 | Dec 9, 2024 | China's opposition to postal service of judicial documents under Hague Convention Art. 10(a) | Binding | China has opposed to send judicial documents directly to persons in China by postal channels (Article 10 (a) of the Hague Service Convention; see UPC_CoA_69/2024). |
| UPC_CoA_69/2024 Court of Appeal | Jul 29, 2024 | procedural | Binding | w Territories, Hong Kong (hereinafter jointly referred to as the Asian TCL companies) LANGUAGE OF THE PROCEEDINGS English UPC Court of Appeal UPC_CoA_69/2024 APL_8972/2024 UPC_CoA_70/2024 APL_8977/2024 2 PANEL AND DECIDING |