UPC_CoA_69/2024

Video decoding device, video decoding method, and program

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2—

Übersicht Entscheidungen Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

NEC Corporation

Vertreter: Tilman Müller (Bardehle Pagenberg)

Beklagte

TCL Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd.
TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd.
TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd.

Richter

Rian KaldenPresiding judge and Judge-rapporteur
Ingeborg SimonssonLegally qualified judge
Patricia RombachLegally qualified judge

Patente

EP2645714
EP3057321

CPC-Codes: H04N19/503, H04N19/593, H04N19/12, H04N19/134, H04N19/172, H04N19/46, H04N19/91, H04N19/60, H04N19/70, H04N19/156, H04N19/184, H04N19/176…

Sektor: Telecommunications

Ausgang

Abgewiesen

Eingereicht: —

Erste Entscheidung: 29. Juli 2024

Sprache: —

Court of Appeal rejected NEC's appeal against the Munich Local Division's refusal to permit service on Chinese and Hong Kong TCL companies by email or by public notice. The CoA held that: (1) service by email to a person not authorised to accept service is invalid; (2) public service at a UPC Local Division is not yet permissible at that stage; (3) attempts at service via the Hague Convention must normally be exhausted before alternative methods are permitted. NEC's appeal was rejected.