Overview · Filed: Dec 4, 2024
UPC_CoA_768/2024
AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
No citations extracted from this case's decisions.
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
| Cited in | Date | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CoA_34/2026 Court of Appeal | Feb 26, 2026 | infringement by equivalents | Binding | On 30 April 2025 (UPC_CoA_768/2024 APL_64374/2024 ORD_69078/2024, "the order on provisional measures") the Court of Appeal found that the attacked embodiments infringe Insulet's patent |
| UPC_CoA_930/2025 Court of Appeal | Mar 18, 2026 | infringement by equivalents | Binding | In its order in preliminary injunction proceedings of 30 April 2025 initiated by Insulet (UPC_CoA_768/2024, APL_64374/2024, ORD_69078/2024) |
| UPC_CoA_534/2024 Court of Appeal | Oct 3, 2025 | costs — minor excess claim not justifying additional costs | Persuasive | handelt es sich um eine verhältnismäßig geringfügige Zuvielforderung, die zudem keine zusätzlichen Kosten verursacht hat (vgl. Berufungsgericht, Anordnung vom 30. April 2025, UPC_CoA_768/2024, APL_64374/2024, Insulet/EOFlow, Rn. 135). |
| UPC_CFI_140/2024 Dusseldorf LD | Jun 16, 2025 | claim construction; court must independently construe claims as matter of law | Binding | As claim construction is a matter of law and the Court must independently construe the claims (UPC_CoA_768/2024, Order of 30 April 2025, Headnote 1 Insulet Corporation v EOFlow) |