UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CoA 773/2024

Dec 10, 2024·EP3223320 · LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Follow
Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent revoked)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Semiconductors
Language
German
First decided
Nov 5, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Torsten DuhmeLocked
Judge Max TilmannLocked

At the UPC: Seoul Semiconductor Group (29 cases)·expert e-Commerce GmbH (14 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 16 other proceedings

UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024·UPC CoA 762/2024 and 11 more

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 258/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2024

Decisions
  • 2025-11-05
    Appeal RoP220.1Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal decision (English) on the appeal in the counterclaim for revocation and the related infringement action concerning Seoul Viosys's EP (LED patent, EP 698). The CoA found added matter in claim 1 of the patent (content extended beyond the earlier application as filed, particularly regarding embodiments with a single mesa). Claims 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 revoked. Infringement action dismissed. Viosys ordered to pay expert's costs for both appeal and first instance proceedings. Key headnotes: court may raise added matter of its own motion; translation of international application governs content; patentee must demonstrate inaccuracy of its own translation.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Added matter (Art. 123(2) EPC)
    • Translation of international application
    • Patentee's burden to demonstrate inaccuracy of translation
    • Added matter raised ex officio by court
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2025-11-06Not public
Decision2025-11-05Not public
Decision2025-11-05Public
Communication2025-11-04Not public
Oral procedure closed2025-09-22Not public
Oral procedure opened2025-09-22Not public
Written procedure closed2025-09-22Not public
Hearing Reference2025-07-10Not public
Hearing Reference2025-07-10Not public
Interim-Procedure-Closure2025-05-26Not public
Summon-Oral-Hearing2025-05-26Not public
close interim procedure2025-05-26Public
Interim-Conference-Decision2025-05-26Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-05-06Not public
Schriftsatz2025-05-06Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-02-20Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-11Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-10Not public
Berufungsbegruendung2025-02-10Not public
Anlage BK3-2025-02-10Not public
Anlage BK32025-02-10Not public
Anlage BK22025-02-10Not public
Anlage BK12025-02-10Not public
Anlage BK42025-02-10Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-01-22Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-12-31Not public
Receipt2024-12-31Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-12-31Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-12-31Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-12-30Not public
Antrag nach RgR16.1(b)2024-12-30Not public
Berufungsschrift (korrigiert)2024-12-30Not public
Antrag gemäß Regel 16.1 (b) RgR2024-12-30Not public
Berufungsschrift2024-12-30Not public
Zahlungsnachweis Berufungsgebühr2024-12-30Not public
Zahlungsnachweis Berufungsgebühr2024-12-30Not public
Formal-checks_Request-for-correction2024-12-27Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-12-10Not public
Berufungsschrift2024-12-10Not public
Zahlungsnachweis Berufungsgebühr2024-12-10Not public
Zahlungsnachweis Berufungsgebühr2024-12-10Not public