UPC CoA 808/2024
Dec 17, 2024·EP2794928 · COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ANALYTE DETECTION
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Withdrawn)ActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- President and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUniversity / research
Representatives- Axel Berger-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- NanoString Technologies Europe LimitedOperating co.
Representatives- Daniela Kinkeldey-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- InstrumentsAnalysis of biological materials
- ChemistryBiotechnology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- May 28, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Peter Blok | Locked |
| Judge Emmanuel Gougé | Locked |
| Judge Rainer Friedrich | Locked |
| Judge Cornelis Schüller | Locked |
At the UPC: President and Fellows of Harvard College (21 cases)·NanoString Group (21 cases)
This dispute contains 3 other proceedings
13 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 3233/2026·UPC CFI 1594/2026·UPC CoA 681/2025·UPC CoA 654/2024·UPC CoA 470/2023 and 8 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2024
- 2025-05-28Application RoP 265Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal permitted NanoString Technologies Europe Limited's withdrawal of the revocation action (UPC_CoA_808/2024 / ACT_551180/2023 / UPC_CFI_252/2023) against Harvard's EP 2 794 928, following NanoString's application filed on 14 May 2025. Harvard agreed to the withdrawal and did not oppose. The withdrawal was permitted as Harvard had no legitimate interest in the action being decided. No costs order was issued. The proceedings were declared closed.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Withdrawal of revocation action under R. 265 RoP
- Release of security deposit
- 2025-05-28
Summary: The Court of Appeal issued an order granting Harvard's application for reimbursement of 60% of the court fees paid for the appeal (UPC_CoA_808/2024) following NanoString's withdrawal of the revocation action. Harvard had paid the appeal court fees as appellant; NanoString had withdrawn the underlying action on 14 May 2025 before closure of the written procedure. The Court ordered reimbursement of 60% of Harvard's appeal court fees under R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Reimbursement of court fees under R. 370.9(b)(i) RoP
- Closure of written procedure as trigger for fee entitlement
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case Closure Formal Check | 2025-09-18 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-06-03 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-06-03 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-05-28 | Not public |
| Order fee reimbursement | 2025-05-28 | Public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2025-05-28 | Not public |
| Decision withdrawal | 2025-05-28 | Public |
| Receipt | 2025-05-23 | Not public |
| Request to order the reimbursement of court fees - Harvard_signed | 2025-05-23 | Not public |
| Preliminary order withdrawal | 2025-05-15 | Not public |