UPC_CoA_810/2024

METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed

This case cites

Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
223	urgency — suspensive effect of appeal requires extreme urgency	Binding	The requirement of an extreme urgency under R 223 RoP has to be established by the applicant. In the present case, the applicant has not evidenced the existence of an extreme urgency.
223.4	standing judge decision without hearing respondent — extreme urgency	Binding	Curio filed a separate R 223.4 RoP application for suspensive effect in which it requests the impugned order be given suspensive effect and the application for suspensive effect be decided by the standing judge
220.2	appeal against interlocutory orders	Background	Curio filed an appeal under Rule 220.2 RoP (PR_APL_65956/2024 UPC_CoA_805/2024) against said order.

Target	Legal point	Strength	Excerpt
41(1)	security for costs — alleged contrariness to Art. 41(1) UPCA	Background	the impugned order is manifestly wrong to the extent it has granted a security for costs to the claimant in the main action because it is contrary to Art. 41(1) UPCA

Cited by

Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.

Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.