UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 844/2024

Dec 30, 2024·EP1793917 +1 more: A DEVICE FOR CARBONATING A LIQUID WITH PRESSURIZED GAS

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Jens Olsson (Gulliksson); Magnus Dahlman (Gulliksson); Emelie Rexelius (Gulliksson)
Respondents
Reps: Andreas von Falck (Hogan Lovells International LLP); Alexander Klicznik (Hogan Lovells International LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Language
English
Decisions
  • 2025-02-19
    WithdrawnApplication Rop 265

    Order from the Court of Appeal dated 19 February 2025 permitting Aarke AB to withdraw its appeal against the Düsseldorf Local Division's judgment (which had found infringement of EP 1 793 917 by Aarke and issued an injunction). The CoA found no legitimate interest of SodaStream in the appeal being decided, and permitted the withdrawal under R. 265.1 RoP. The appeal was declared closed and a cost decision was issued as required by R. 265.2(c) RoP.

    Legal issues:Withdrawal of appeal under R. 265.1 RoPCosts decision on withdrawal under R. 265.2(c) RoPCourt fee reimbursement under R. 370.9 RoP
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-09-24Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-02-19Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-19Not public
Final order on withdrawal2025-02-19Public
request for comments2025-02-12Not public
Receipt2025-01-10Not public
Application for leave to withdraw an action and Application for reimbursement of Court fees2025-01-10Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-01-09Not public
Receipt2025-01-09Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-01-09Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-12-30Not public
Statement of Appeal2024-12-30Not public