View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- SodaStream Industries Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Andreas von Falck-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Alexander Klicznik-Hogan Lovells International LLP
Respondents- Aarke ABOperating co.
Representatives- Jens Olsson-Gulliksson
- Magnus Dahlman-Gulliksson
- Emelie Rexelius-Gulliksson
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- ChemistryChemical engineering
- Mechanical engineeringHandling
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 6, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
| Judge András Kupecz | Locked |
At the UPC: SodaStream Industries Ltd. (7 cases)·Aarke AB (6 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CoA 844/2024·UPC CFI 759/2024·UPC CoA 548/2024·UPC CFI 373/2023·UPC APP 55249/2024
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-09-06Application RoP 333Public
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued an order on panel review under Rule 333 RoP of a prior order concerning security for legal costs requested by defendant Aarke AB against claimant SodaStream Industries Ltd., addressing the applicable standard of proof and factors for ordering security.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Security for legal costs (R. 158 RoP)
- Panel review (R. 333 RoP)
- Financial risk and enforceability of cost order
Documents
- 27886EDA1A21F57D752EE9B148379984_en.pdf2024-09-06EN