UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 891/2025

Oct 17, 2025·EP3821580 · METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT NETWORK PROTECTION

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Feb 4, 2026
EPO Opposition
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked
Judge Emanuela GermanoLocked
Judge Eric AugardeLocked
Judge Torsten DuhmeLocked

At the UPC: Centripetal Limited (22 cases)·Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (12 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-02-04
    Appeal RoP220.1Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal ruled on the admissibility of Centripetal's amended requests in its appeal concerning an application for preserving evidence and inspecting premises at Palo Alto's Mannheim offices. The order addresses whether amended requests submitted on appeal are admissible and how the preservation/inspection procedure should proceed. The Court ordered the evidence preservation and inspection subject to specified conditions. Judges: Klaus Grabinski (President), Peter Blok (judge-rapporteur), Emanuela Germano, Eric Augarde, Torsten Duhme.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Admissibility of amended requests on appeal
    • Preservation of evidence and inspection of premises (Art. 60 UPCA)
    • Admissibility of evidence preservation for digital evidence
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-02-04Not public
Decision2026-02-04Not public
Final Order2026-02-04Public
Oral procedure closed2026-01-19Not public
Note2026-01-19Not public
Oral procedure opened2025-12-05Not public
Interim procedure closed2025-12-05Not public
Summons to oral hearing2025-12-05Not public
Summons2025-12-05Public
Cover sheet2025-12-04Not public